April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Micro x-ray Computed Tomographic Analysis of Porous Orbital Implants
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Philip Wright
    Tissue Engineering and Advanced Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy,
    Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,
    University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Lisa White
    Tissue Engineering and Advanced Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy,
    University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Lloyd Hamilton
    Tissue Engineering and Advanced Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy,
    University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Yvonne Reinwald
    Tissue Engineering and Advanced Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy,
    University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Naing L. Tint
    Tissue Engineering and Advanced Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy,
    Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,
    University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Felicity R. Rose
    Tissue Engineering and Advanced Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy,
    University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Philip Wright, None; Lisa White, None; Lloyd Hamilton, None; Yvonne Reinwald, None; Naing L. Tint, None; Felicity R. Rose, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  MRC discipline hopping grant, University of Nottingham
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 738. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Philip Wright, Lisa White, Lloyd Hamilton, Yvonne Reinwald, Naing L. Tint, Felicity R. Rose; Micro x-ray Computed Tomographic Analysis of Porous Orbital Implants. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):738.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

The aim of this study is to fully characterize, in 3-D, thephysical properties of different commercially available porousorbital implants.

 
Methods:
 

BioEye Coralline (Integrated Orbital Implants, San Diego, USA),MedPor and MedPor Bioglass (Porex, USA), Aluminium Oxide andSynthetic Hydroxyapatite (Ceramisys, Sheffield, UK) implantswere utilized in the study. Micro x-ray computed tomographic(MicroCT) analysis was performed using a high resolution Skyscansystem (Skyscan 1174, Skyscan, Belgium). A Skyscan suppliedsoftware package was used for processing the image datasets.Pore sizes were obtained performing morphometrical calculations.Porosity was calculated from the object volume and the totalvolume. An in-house developed interconnectivity algorithm wasused to quantify the accessible space (interconnectivity) ofthe implants.

 
Results:
 

Results are summarised in Table 1: and Figure 1:  

 

 
Conclusions:
 

The present study demonstrates significant variation in poresize and porosity between the different implants. The greatestvariation being shown in the porous polyethylene (Medpor) implants.Coral, alumina oxide and synthetic hydroxyapatite demonstratedmost consistent pore size as well as being the most porous.There was significant variability in interconnectivity betweenthe different porous implants. These differences may accountfor variations in rate of fibrovascular ingrowth.

 
Keywords: imaging/image analysis: non-clinical • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • computational modeling 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×