April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Changes in Primate Crystalline Lens Volume During Simulation of Accommodation in a Lens Stretcher
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lauren K. Marussich
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
    Biomedical Optics and Laser Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Univ of Miami, College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida
  • Derek Nankivil
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Bianca M. Maceo
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
    Biomedical Optics and Laser Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Univ of Miami, College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida
  • Esdras Arrieta
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Raksha Urs
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
    Biomedical Optics and Laser Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Univ of Miami, College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida
  • Fabrice Manns
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
    Biomedical Optics and Laser Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Univ of Miami, College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida
  • Arthur Ho
    Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Robert C. Augusteyn
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  • Jean-Marie A. Parel
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univ of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Lauren K. Marussich, None; Derek Nankivil, None; Bianca M. Maceo, None; Esdras Arrieta, None; Raksha Urs, None; Fabrice Manns, None; Arthur Ho, None; Robert C. Augusteyn, None; Jean-Marie A. Parel, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH 2R01EY14225, P30EY14801; the Australian Federal Government Cooperative Research Centres Program (Vision CRC);Florida Lions Eye Bank;Research to Prevent Blindness;Henri & Flore Lesieur Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 814. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lauren K. Marussich, Derek Nankivil, Bianca M. Maceo, Esdras Arrieta, Raksha Urs, Fabrice Manns, Arthur Ho, Robert C. Augusteyn, Jean-Marie A. Parel; Changes in Primate Crystalline Lens Volume During Simulation of Accommodation in a Lens Stretcher. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):814.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine if the lens volume changes during accommodation in a lens stretcher.

Methods: : 2 baboon lenses (3.1-9.6 years, PMT=2-24 hours) and 8 cyno lenses (1.4-9.1 years, PMT=3-50 hours) were mounted in a lens stretcher that simulates accommodation by applying radial forces (EVAS II, Ehrmann et al, Clin Exp Opt, 2008). The central cross-sectional lens shape in the unstretched state and at maximum stretch was measured using a custom-made time-domain Optical Coherence Tomography system (Uhlhorn et al, Vis Res, 2008). The lens volume was calculated using two different methods. In method 1, the lens is assumed to be an ellipsoid of revolution. In method 2, the lens contour is fit with an even Fourier cosine series (Urs et al, Vis Res, 2010) and the cross-sectional area is calculated. Volume is then calculated assuming that the lens is rotationally symmetric. The volumes in the stretched and unstretched states calculated using Methods 1 and 2 were compared using a Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: : The cosine model provided a closer fit to the actual lens shape than the elliptical model. With method 1, the lens volume decreased by (5±11) mm3 (p = 0.112). With method 2, the lens volume decreased by (2±4) mm3 (p = 0.109). The elliptical model over-predicts the unstretched, stretched and change in volume by (13±7) mm3 (p<0.001) (10±6) mm3 (p<0.001) and (3±10) mm3 (p = 0.107). The change in lens volume predicted by the cosine model for any baboon lens (95% PI) is less than 8% and not statistically significant.

Conclusions: : The ellipsoid model overestimates the volume and change in lens volume during accommodation. There are no statistically significant changes in lens volume during accommodation in the EVAS II lens stretcher.Support:NIH Grant 2R01EY14225, NIH Center Grant P30EY14801; the Australian Federal Government Cooperative Research Centres Program (Vision CRC); the Florida Lions Eye Bank; Research to Prevent Blindness; Henri and Flore Lesieur Foundation (JMP)

Keywords: accommodation • presbyopia • imaging/image analysis: non-clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×