April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Structural and Functional Outcome of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ankur N. Mehta
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Inst/Wayne State Univ, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • Michelle J. Ubels
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Inst/Wayne State Univ, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • Asheesh Tewari
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Inst/Wayne State Univ, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • Tamer H. Mahmoud
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Inst/Wayne State Univ, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Ankur N. Mehta, None; Michelle J. Ubels, None; Asheesh Tewari, None; Tamer H. Mahmoud, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 993. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ankur N. Mehta, Michelle J. Ubels, Asheesh Tewari, Tamer H. Mahmoud; Structural and Functional Outcome of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):993.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To determine the anatomical and functional outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on refractory DME despite previous therapy.

 
Methods:
 

Retrospective interventional study of patients with refractory DME who have undergone PPV with ILM peeling. Data was collected at baseline, 3, 6 (primary end point), and 12 month post-operative visits. Patient demographics, DME treatment history including macular photocoagulation, intravitreal steroids and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) central macular thickness was recorded at each visit. Exclusion criteria included any history of DME treatment or peripheral retinal photocoagulation (PRP) within 3 months of surgery and other ocular surgery (including cataract extraction and YAG capsulotomy) within 6 months of surgery.

 
Results:
 

Eighteen eyes of 15 patients (7 males, 8 females) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 64±11.1 years. Average duration of diabetes was 20±7.7 years. At baseline, mean logMAR BCVA was 0.9 (20/175) and mean OCT thickness was 442±118 µm. Seven eyes had been treated with focal laser only, 5 eyes with focal laser and anti-VEGF injections, 1 eye with anti-VEGF injection only, 1 eye with focal laser and intravitreal steroid, and 4 eyes with no prior treatment. During PPV, additional procedures included PRP in 55% and posterior subtenon steroid injection at the close of surgery in 72%. At 6 months, mean OCT thickness decreased to 299±77 µm (p=.0004) and logMAR BCVA improved to 0.7 (20/100, p=0.02). ETDRS BCVA improved by >2 lines in 50%, deteriorated by >2 lines in 22%, and remained stable in 28%. No major surgical complications were observed during the follow-up period.

 
Conclusions:
 

Some patients may present with refractory DME despite a wide range of currently available treatment options including focal laser, intravitreal steroids, and anti-VEGF agents. PPV with ILM peeling for refractory DME can result in significant improvement in BCVA and reduction of retinal thickness.

 
Keywords: edema • vitreoretinal surgery • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×