March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Biological Feasibility Study for Implantable Continuous Intraocular Pressure Monitor
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kimberly A. Brown
    Ophthalmology, East Florida Eye Insitute, Stuart, Florida
  • Ronald E. Frenkel
    Ophthalmology, East Florida Eye Insitute, Stuart, Florida
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer, Miami, Florida
  • Heather B. Seith
    Ophthalmology, East Florida Eye Insitute, Stuart, Florida
  • Esdras Arrieta
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Biophysics Center--Bascom Palmer, Miami, Florida
  • Jean-Marie Parel
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Biophysics Center--Bascom Palmer, Miami, Florida
  • M Jaeger
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Biophysics Center--Bascom Palmer, Miami, Florida
  • R Kline-Schroeder
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Biophysics Center--Bascom Palmer, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Kimberly A. Brown, None; Ronald E. Frenkel, None; Heather B. Seith, None; Esdras Arrieta, None; Jean-Marie Parel, None; M. Jaeger, None; R. Kline-Schroeder, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 1995. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kimberly A. Brown, Ronald E. Frenkel, Heather B. Seith, Esdras Arrieta, Jean-Marie Parel, M Jaeger, R Kline-Schroeder; Biological Feasibility Study for Implantable Continuous Intraocular Pressure Monitor. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):1995.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine the biological feasibility of implantation of an anterior chamber device to continuously monitor intraocular pressure.

Methods: : A round disc of 3.3 mm diameter and 500 micrometer thickness, coated with Parylene which had been modified in order to facilitate suturing was implanted in the anterior chamber of one eye of three feline subjects. Follow up was at the slit lamp or by exam under anesthesia periodically from day 1 to 90.

Results: : In two of three subjects device stability and centration was good throughout the observed period. Focal inflammation of the cornea and fibrin in the anterior chamber were present in all three subjects. In all subjects iris synechiae developed between the iris and the device. In subject 1 there was significant diffuse corneal edema, an iron fragment was found in the endothelium on day 28 and by day 90 the device was resting on the corneal endothelium, there were significant iron and rust deposits and significant diffuse corneal pannus and opacification. Subject 1 developed a cataract. Subjects 1 and 3 developed rubeosis of the iris in the area surrounding the device. Inflammatory reaction was observed, fibrin covered the sutures. Mechanical contact between the lens and the device caused cataract formation. No clinical changes or alterations were observed in the retina. The feline anterior chamber is not an easy model for implantation due to the eye and orbit anatomy because the eyelid aperture and nictitating membrane limit globe exposure and the cul de sac is shallow.

Conclusions: : Continuous intraocular sensor placement in the anterior chamber is potentially feasible if the sensor is reduced in size such that it does not contact the corneal endothelium, iris, or lens.

Keywords: anterior chamber • clinical laboratory testing • intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×