April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Diagnostic and Economic Yield of the Nonspecific Laboratory Work-up of Uveitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sonul Mehta
    Ophthalmology, Georgetown University/Washington Hospital Center, Washington, Dist. of Columbia
  • Gustavo Corrales
    Ophthalmology, Georgetown University/Washington Hospital Center, Washington, Dist. of Columbia
  • Michael Summerfield
    Ophthalmology, Georgetown University/Washington Hospital Center, Washington, Dist. of Columbia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Sonul Mehta, None; Gustavo Corrales, None; Michael Summerfield, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1480. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sonul Mehta, Gustavo Corrales, Michael Summerfield; Diagnostic and Economic Yield of the Nonspecific Laboratory Work-up of Uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1480.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

There is an extensive differential for the causes of anterior uveitis. A battery of diagnostic tests are often conducted to help identify a specific etiology; however, a nonspecific approach to the laboratory work-up for anterior uveitis can be both costly and inefficient. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no reported studies in the US that evaluate the cost-effectiveness and diagnostic yield of a nonspecific approach to the laboratory work-up for anterior uveitis in an inner city hospital in the US.

 
Methods:
 

This retrospective chart review included 100 consecutive patients with a new diagnosis of anterior uveits. Patients with a diagnosis of traumatic, post-operative, or HSV related anterior uveitis were excluded. Laboratory findings were classified as normal or abnormal and significant or not significant. Laboratory workup performed for patients included the following tests: CBC, ESR, CRP, HLA-B27. RPR, FTA-ABS, ACE level, Lyme titer, Toxoplasmosis titer, PPD, urinalysis, Chest X-ray. The total costs for all laboratory tests and cost per significant finding were calculated.

 
Results:
 

The demographics of the patient population studied included mean age 49.4 years, 54% female, and 46% male. The overall percent of patients with at least one abnormal laboratory test result was 64%. ESR, CRP, and Urinanalysis had a diagnostic yield of 0%. CBC, HLA-B27, Lyme titer, PPD, and CXR had a diagnostic yield of less than 10%. RPR, FTA-BS, ACE levels, and Toxoplasmosis titer had the highest diagnostic yield in the inner-city patient population studied. Total cost of all laboratory studies performed was $59,570. Cost per clinically significant and relevant finding was $1805. Instead if a targeted approach to laboratory work-up had been employed, the projected total cost of all laboratory studies would be $29,072, and the cost per significant finding would be $632.

 
Conclusions:
 

A nonspecific approach to the laboratory work-up in the initial diagnosis of uveitis is both inefficient and cost-intensive.

 
Keywords: uveitis-clinical/animal model 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×