April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Bipolar and Amacrine Input to Midget and Parasol Ganglion Cells in the Retina of Marmosets
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Carla J. Abbott
    Save Sight Institute and ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Kumiko A. Percival
    Save Sight Institute and ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Paul R. Martin
    Save Sight Institute and ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Ulrike Grunert
    Save Sight Institute and ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Carla J. Abbott, None; Kumiko A. Percival, None; Paul R. Martin, None; Ulrike Grunert, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Health & Medical Research Council Project Grant 454460; ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision; Melbourne Research Scholarship (K.A.P.)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1606. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carla J. Abbott, Kumiko A. Percival, Paul R. Martin, Ulrike Grunert; Bipolar and Amacrine Input to Midget and Parasol Ganglion Cells in the Retina of Marmosets. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1606.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To study the density and arrangement of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input to the dendrites of midget and parasol ganglion cells in marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) retina.

Methods: : Ganglion cells were retrogradely labeled (5% dextran, tetramethylrhodamine and biotin, 3000 MW "microruby") from the lateral geniculate nucleus and subsequently photo-filled (Dacey et al., 2003). Retinas containing retrogradely labeled cells were processed simultaneously with antibodies against the GluR4 subunit of the AMPA receptor to identify presumed bipolar cell synapses (excitatory input) and antibodies against gephyrin to identify presumed amacrine cell synapses (inhibitory input). Some intracellularly injected parasol cells from peripheral retina (Lin et al., 2000, Visual Neuroscience) were also used. Animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Results: : Twenty midget (15 OFF, 5 ON) and 32 parasol cells (15 OFF, 17 ON) from central retina (eccentricity 0.2 to 2.5 mm), and six parasol cells (2 OFF, 4 ON) from peripheral retina (eccentricity 4.5 to 8 mm) were analyzed. Midget and parasol cells from central retina had comparable average densities of colocalized immunoreactive (IR) puncta; about 5 GluR4 IR puncta and about 6 to 7 gephyrin IR puncta per 100 µm² dendritic surface area, and for both cell types approximately 18% of gephyrin IR puncta were located within 1 µm of a GluR4 IR punctum. The density of colocalized GluR4 and gephyrin IR puncta was weakly correlated for central midget cells but strongly correlated for central parasol cells (correlation coefficients: 0.28 and 0.77). The parasol cells from peripheral retina had greater presumed inhibitory input (12 gephyrin IR puncta per 100 µm² dendritic surface area, ANOVA; P < 0.05) but comparable presumed excitatory input (8 GluR4 IR puncta per 100 µm² dendritic surface area) to those from central retina.

Conclusions: : Inhibitory input increases in peripheral cells. Approximately one-fifth of amacrine synapses to both midget and parasol ganglion cells are likely to be involved in feed-forward synapses at dyads.

Keywords: retina: proximal (bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells) • synapse • retinal connections, networks, circuitry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×