April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Anti-VEGF Monotherapy for Exudative ARMD - Monitoring Clinical Response by Multimodality Imaging
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mark H. Nelson
    North Carolina Macular Consultants, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Mark H. Nelson, Heidelberg Engineering, Inc. (C), QLT, Inc. (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1776. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mark H. Nelson; Anti-VEGF Monotherapy for Exudative ARMD - Monitoring Clinical Response by Multimodality Imaging. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1776.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

A framework for sub-classification of Exudative ARMD has been previously described (Nelson, ARVO 2010)(Table 1) and requires multimodality imaging including spectral-domain OCT, IVFA and ICG videoangiography for evaluation. In addition, it is clear that many patients with Exudative ARMD have persistent leakage after non-selective anti-VEGF monotherapy due to resistant lesions ( polypoidal vasculopathy and arteriolarized neovascularization ) which can only be identified on ICG imaging. These lesions create a dependence on anti-VEGF monotherapy in up to 50% of treated patients. It is important to understand the typical response to non-selective anti-VEGF monotherapy for each subtype of Exudative ARMD so that deviations can be identified and that imaging can be repeated to determine whether the neovascular process has changed.

 
Methods:
 

Retrospective study of Treatment-Naive Exudative ARMD patients

 
Results:
 

Classic and occult membranes respond differently to anti-VEGF monotherapy. Classic membranes regress, with various degrees of leakage resolution and damage/restoration to the IS/OS junction. This is often related to the degree of arteriolarization or the presence of concurrent polyp formation. Recurrent leakage is not uncommon - careful examination frequently reveals a new area of classic neovascularization. Occult membranes respond with intraretinal and subretinal leakage resolution, however the neovascular complex posterior to the RPE is often unaffected by the therapy. In addition, stable occult membrane may be associated with RPE breach and progression into a classic membrane formation. RPEDs may respond by collapse or rip and often can be seen as a fibrovascular RPED where the previous serous fluid is replaced by more permanent solid fibrovascular core.

 
Conclusions:
 

Treating patients with Exudative ARMD with non-selective anti-VEGF monotherapy requires monitoring by multi-modality imaging to determine if the neovascular process is responsive (regressing), nonresponsive, or recurring.  

 
Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×