April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Adaptive Gait Changes due to Ocular Magnification in Older People
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David B. Elliott
    Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
  • Graham J. Chapman
    Centre for Health, Sport and Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  David B. Elliott, None; Graham J. Chapman, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Federation of Ophthalmic and Dispensing Opticians grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1913. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David B. Elliott, Graham J. Chapman; Adaptive Gait Changes due to Ocular Magnification in Older People. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1913.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Intervention trials that reduce visual impairment in older adults have not produced the expected improvements in reducing falls rate. We hypothesised that this may be caused by adaptation problems by older adults due to changes in ocular magnification provided by new spectacles and/or cataract surgery. This study assessed the effects of lens magnification on adaptive gait in young and older adults.

Methods: : Adaptive gait was measured in 10 young (mean age 22.3 ± 4.6 years) and 10 older adults (mean age 74.2 ± 4.3 years) with the participants’ habitual refractive correction (0%) and with size lenses producing ocular magnification of ±1%, ±2%, ±3%, and ±5%. Adaptive gait parameters were measured when participants approached and stepped up onto a single step.

Results: : Adaptive gait changes in the young and older age groups were similar. Increasing amounts of magnification (+1% to +5%) led to an increased distance of the feet from the step, increased vertical toe clearance and reduced distance of the lead heel position on the step (p < 0.0001). Increasing amounts of minification (-1% to -5%) led to the opposite of these changes (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: : The adaptive gait changes were driven by the magnification changes provided by the size lenses. Steps appeared closer and larger with magnification and further away and smaller with minification and gait was adjusted accordingly. Magnification may explain the mobility problems some older adults have with updated spectacles and after cataract surgery. Adaptation to ocular magnification did not occur in the short term in young or older adults.

Keywords: vision and action • aging • refraction 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.