March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
The Impact Of Stimulus Duration In Mesopic Microperimetry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Margherita Casciano
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    The International Microperimetry Reading Centre, Padova, Italy
  • Enrica Convento
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    The International Microperimetry Reading Centre, Padova, Italy
  • Evelyn Longhin
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    Fondazione G. B. Bietti, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
  • Stela Vujosevic
    The International Microperimetry Reading Centre, Padova, Italy
    Fondazione G. B. Bietti, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
  • Edoardo Midena
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    The International Microperimetry Reading Centre, Padova, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Margherita Casciano, None; Enrica Convento, None; Evelyn Longhin, None; Stela Vujosevic, None; Edoardo Midena, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 2201. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Margherita Casciano, Enrica Convento, Evelyn Longhin, Stela Vujosevic, Edoardo Midena; The Impact Of Stimulus Duration In Mesopic Microperimetry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):2201.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate if different light stimuli duration may modify final sensibility thresholds during microperimetry (MP) examination.

Methods: : Twenty healthy subjects (20 eyes) were enrolled in this study. Two consecutive microperimetry examinations (MAIA; CenterVue, Padova, Italy) were performed 30 minutes apart from each other, with following parameters: 37-stimuli grid covering central 24° of the macula, 4-2 threshold strategy, fixation target: red circle of 1° diameter, stimulus size Goldmann III, background luminance set at 4 asb, stimulus dynamic range 36 dB. Duration of light stimulus was set at 200 msec or 40 msec. The sequence of exams with the 2 different stimuli duration was randomly performed. Fixation stability was determined for each examination. Stable fixation was indicated when more than 75% of the fixation points were located within a predetermined circle area of 2° (P1), regardless of the position of the foveal center. Relatively unstable fixation was indicated if less than 75% of the fixation points were located within a 2° circle, but if more than 75% of the fixation points were located within a 4° circle area (P2). Unstable fixation was indicated if less than 75% were located within a 4° circle.

Results: : Mean age of included subjects was 27.5±3.9 years. Mean light thresholds were significantly reduced with 40 msec-MP (24.7±1.1 dB) versus 200 msec-MP (28.1±1.0 dB) examination, (p=0.0001). Mean duration of 40 msec exams was 4.7±0.3 min, versus 4.7±0.5 min of 200 msec, (p>0.1). Fixation was stable in all subjects with 40 and 200 msec stimuli duration. The number of fixation points in P1 and P2 areas did not show any difference between 40 msec-MP and 200 msec-MP examination, (p>0.1).

Conclusions: : Short stimuli duration decreases mean retinal thresholds during microperimetry examination in normals. Fixation stability seems not to be dependent on stimuli duration in normals. This finding should be taken into account in planning clinical trials.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • retina • perimetry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×