April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Evaluation Of Membranes Material For Impression Cytology
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Pierre Roy
    OPIA Technologies SAS, Paris, France
    Iris Pharma, La Gaude, France
  • Nicolas Cimbolini
    Iris Pharma, La Gaude, France
  • Laurence Feraille
    Iris Pharma, La Gaude, France
  • Pierre-Paul Elena
    Iris Pharma, La Gaude, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Pierre Roy, OPIA Technologies SAS (P); Nicolas Cimbolini, None; Laurence Feraille, None; Pierre-Paul Elena, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1937. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pierre Roy, Nicolas Cimbolini, Laurence Feraille, Pierre-Paul Elena; Evaluation Of Membranes Material For Impression Cytology. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1937.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Impression cytology (IC) is now an accepted technique for collecting the most superficial layer of the conjunctival cells ((both goblet and non-goblet cells) for the analysis of ocular surface disorders. The type of filter paper (characterized by pore size and base material) and the technique of cell collection will affect the number and state of epithelial cells collected. Larger pore sizes collect cells better, but cell morphology is less well preserved. Presence of surfactant may also reduces cell pick up. Most authors suggest the use of filter paper of a pore size between 0.22 and 0.44 µm, but most filters present an asymetric structure. We also investigated the potential of a new device to collect cells from conjunctival epithelium. Number and state of collected cells were evaluated using different membrane materials.

Methods: : Supero-temporal conjunctival epithelium of pigmented rabbits (3 per sample) was sampled using 69 sqmm filter membranes. Different materials (Millipore Mixed Cellulose ester - MCE - with and without surfactant, Pall and Millipore Polysulfone - PSU -, symmetric, asymmetric or oleophobic) were tested, Asymmetric membranes were tested both sides. All membranes have a pore size of 0.2µm. Rabbit were anesthetized for precise collection procedure without local anesthesia.Membrane were stained in PAS-Hematoxylin and cells counted at 3 locations per sample on a 170µmx133µm area using confocal microscopy.

Results: : MCE membranes mean cell count was 118 (SD 120), MCE surfactant free membrane was 3 (SD 4). Cell counts for PSU membranes, smooth side Millipore TCMF, EIMF (high flow), Pall SUPOR were 7 (SD 8), 12 (SD 10), 282 (SD 340) respectively. Cell counts for PSU membranes, rough side Millipore TCMF and EIMF was impossible due to cell lysis. Cell count for Pall SUPOR on rough side was 543 (SD 254).Cell count for PALL SUPOR R (oleophobic) was 0 on both sides.

Conclusions: : These results show membranes for IC cannot be characterized only by pore size. Membrane structure, asymetric surface and role of surfactant play a critical role for the number of cells collected. Choice of appropriate membrane characteristics together with a new collection device improves cell collection in IC and potential for exploitation.

Keywords: cytology • conjunctiva • flow cytometry 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.