April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison of Corneal Healing After Exposure to the Blistering Agents Nitrogen Mustard and UVB
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Iris Po
    Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Andrea S. DeSantis
    Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Rita A. Hahn
    Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Donald R. Gerecke
    Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Jeffrey D. Laskin
    Environmental and Occupational Medicine, UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Marion K. Gordon
    Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Iris Po, None; Andrea S. DeSantis, None; Rita A. Hahn, None; Donald R. Gerecke, None; Jeffrey D. Laskin, None; Marion K. Gordon, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY009056; AR055073; ES005022
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1993. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Iris Po, Andrea S. DeSantis, Rita A. Hahn, Donald R. Gerecke, Jeffrey D. Laskin, Marion K. Gordon; Comparison of Corneal Healing After Exposure to the Blistering Agents Nitrogen Mustard and UVB. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1993.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Nitrogen mustard (NM) and ultraviolet B light (UVB) are vesicants that induce microbullae in the cornea. Severe exposures result in the loss of epithelial-stromal integrity. Physicians treat mustard wounds under the assumption that they heal more slowly than equivalent injuries with epithelial-stromal (or epidermal-dermal) separations. We set out to experimentally determine whether or not this presumption is true.

Methods: : Rabbit corneas in air lifted organ cultures (Gordon et al., J. Ocul Pharmacol. Ther. 26:407-419, 2010) were exposed to different intensities of UVB and different exposures of NM. UVB exposures were 100, 400, 800, 1200 and 1600 mJ/cm2. For NM, corneas were exposed to 100 nmoles of the vesicant for 30, 60 or 120 min. Composites of overlapping micrographs of H&E stained sections covering the entire diameter of cornea were analyzed to determine what conditions resulted in equivalent phenotypes at 24 hr post exposure. Corneas with equivalent 24 hr injuries were allowed to heal for 1-10 days. The timing of re-epithelialization was determined and the appearance and removal of provisional matrix components SPARC and hevin were assessed by immunofluorescence.

Results: : At 24 hours post exposure, a nearly equivalent epithelial-stromal separation was observed with 2000mJ/cm2 UVB (61.7% separation) and with a 60 min exposure to 100 nmol NM (58.3% separation). The UVB-exposed corneas re-epithelialized within 5 days, while the NM-exposed cornea took 7 days to re-epithelialize. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that provisional wound matrix components HEVIN and SPARC persisted at least 1 day longer in the NM-exposed corneas than in UVB-exposed corneas.

Conclusions: : These data experimentally verify that mustard-induced corneal injuries heal more slowly than equivalent UVB injuries. Both re-epithelialization and removal of provisional matrix components require longer times in NM-exposed corneas.

Keywords: cornea: basic science • wound healing • extracellular matrix 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×