March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study II (CTFS II): Patient Baseline Characteristics And Influence Of Recipient Age On Risk Of Rejection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • John Armitage
    Clinical Sciences,
    University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Helen L. Winton
    Clinical Sciences,
    University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Mark N. Jones
    NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Chris A. Rogers
    Clinical Sciences,
    University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Jeff L. Bidwell
    Cellular and Molecular Medicine,
    University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Derek M. Tole
    Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Andrew D. Dick
    Clinical Sciences,
    University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  John Armitage, None; Helen L. Winton, None; Mark N. Jones, None; Chris A. Rogers, None; Jeff L. Bidwell, None; Derek M. Tole, None; Andrew D. Dick, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Eye Research Centre SCIAD036
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 2385. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John Armitage, Helen L. Winton, Mark N. Jones, Chris A. Rogers, Jeff L. Bidwell, Derek M. Tole, Andrew D. Dick; Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study II (CTFS II): Patient Baseline Characteristics And Influence Of Recipient Age On Risk Of Rejection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):2385.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Allograft rejection remains a major cause of corneal transplant failure. The Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study II (CTFS II) is a prospective, multicentre clinical trial to investigate the influence of HLA class II matching in high risk penetrating keratoplasty (PK). This paper presents the baseline characteristics of the transplants included in the study and reports a reduced risk of rejection with increasing recipient age.

Methods: : 1130 high risk PKs have been accrued to the study. All were matched for HLA class I and allocated to the three study groups of 0, 1 or 2 HLA-DR mismatches by cohort minimization. Donors andrecipients were HLA typed by DNA methodology to avoid the inherent errors in serological typing. Patients were followed up at 6 months and then annually to 5 years. Time to first rejection was the primary outcome. An interim analysis was carried out on 776 transplants with 2 year follow up. Rejection-free survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groupsusing Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: : Overall, regraft was the most frequent indication contributing almost 45% of transplants to the study. This was followed by bullous keratopathy with 21% of transplants. Of the preoperative risk factors, 60% of corneas were vascularized, 21% of eyes had glaucoma and 22% had inflammation or infection. 18% of transplants were fully matched for HLA-DR while 46% and 36% had, respectively, 1 or 2 HLA-DR mismatches. In the interim analysis, 74% of patients (95% CI 71-77, n=776) were rejection-free at 2 years. There was a marked, albeit time-dependent, influence of recipient age on freedom from rejection at 2-years, which varied from 66% (95% CI 56-74, n=112) for recipients ≤40 years old to 86% (95% CI 77-92, n=110) for recipients >80 years old (p=0.0003).

Conclusions: : Recruitment to CTFS II has now closed. Final analysis of the influence of HLA class II matching on risk of allograft rejection will take place when 5-year follow up has been completed for alltransplants. The marked influence of recipient age on risk of rejection observed in the interim analysis suggests that purported age-related changes in the immune system, such as reduced numbers of dendritic cells and reduced ability of generate naïve T-cells, render older recipients less prone to corneal allograft rejection than younger recipients.

Clinical Trial: : http://www.isrctn.org ISRCTN25094892

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • transplantation • aging 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×