April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Accuracy of Referring Diagnosis in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Julia M. Fullerton
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Douglas J. Covert
    Ophthalmology, Associated Retinal Consultants, Traverse City, Michigan
  • David V. Weinberg
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Julia M. Fullerton, None; Douglas J. Covert, None; David V. Weinberg, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2139. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Julia M. Fullerton, Douglas J. Covert, David V. Weinberg; Accuracy of Referring Diagnosis in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2139.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To explore relationships between presenting patient characteristics such as age, visual acuity, exam findings, and referring diagnosis in patients with active central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

Methods: : Retrospective chart review of patients with a diagnosis of CSCR. Inclusion criteria included examination by an Eye Institute retina specialist during active disease with supporting fundus exam and imaging from May 2005 through October 2008. Age, presenting visual acuity (VA), referring diagnosis, presenting medications, exam findings on OCT, and FA, as well as final VA were recorded. Logistic regression was used to determine if accuracy of referring diagnosis was associated with other baseline covariates.

Results: : 59 cases of active CSCR (48 men and 11 women) met inclusion criteria. Mean age of presentation was 51.2 years (SD=13.3 years), median 51 years. Presenting VA ranged from 20/20 to 20/200 with a mean of 20/39.1 and median 20/40. 30 patients of the 57 (52.6 %) with recorded referring diagnosis were referred with a diagnosis of CSCR. Mean VA of patients with referring diagnosis of CSCR was 20/31, whereas mean VA with any other diagnosis was 20/49 (p=0.05). For every one year increase in age, referring diagnosis was 0.95 times as likely to be CSR (95% CI: 0.91-0.99, p=0.027). 15 of 59 (25.4%) patients were on corticosteroids (oral, topical, or inhaled) on presentation. Patients who were using any form of corticosteroid on presentation were 0.25 times as likely as patients without current corticosteroid use to be referred with a diagnosis of CSCR (95% CI: 0.069-0.92, p =0.036).

Conclusions: : Slightly over half of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy were referred to a retina subspecialist with a correct diagnosis. Younger age, better visual acuity, and absent use of corticosteroids were associated with a greater likelihood of a correct referring diagnosis.

Keywords: choroid • macula/fovea • retina 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.