April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Cone Dysfunction: a Common Sign That Differentiate Mendelian High Myopia From Complex High Myopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xueshan Xiao
    Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Panfeng Wang
    Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Xiangming Guo
    Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Qingjiong Zhang
    Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Xueshan Xiao, None; Panfeng Wang, None; Xiangming Guo, None; Qingjiong Zhang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NSFC 30971588
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2387. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xueshan Xiao, Panfeng Wang, Xiangming Guo, Qingjiong Zhang; Cone Dysfunction: a Common Sign That Differentiate Mendelian High Myopia From Complex High Myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2387.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : High myopia is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness due to its associated complications. Genetic factors play an important role in the development of high myopia. We have proposed to classify high myopia as Mendelian trait and complex trait in our previous studies (IOVS 2009; 50:1546; Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128:1473). It will be important to find a sign that can differentiate Mendelian high myopia (mHM) from complex high myopia (cHM).

Methods: : Thirty three subjects with high myopia presented before school age were collected (mHM group). Meanwhile, we ascertained ten subjects who had myopia onset at primary school and progressed to high myopia at high school (cHM group). Electroretinogram was recorded in all 86 eyes.

Results: : The amplitude of cone b-wave in mHM group is significantly lower than cHM group (p<0.0001). We did not find significant difference on other components.

Conclusions: : Reduction of Cone b-wave is a specific sign the may differentiate mHM from cHM. It suggests cone dysfunction in mHM and implies a specific signal pathway that may participate in the development of mHM.

Keywords: myopia • genetics • electroretinography: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×