March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Quantitative Assessment of the Effect of ICG-assisted Chromovitrectomy on Macular function
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alexandra Goz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Tatjana Josifova
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Ulrike Schneider
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Paul B. Henrich
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Alexandra Goz, None; Tatjana Josifova, None; Ulrike Schneider, None; Paul B. Henrich, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 2642. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alexandra Goz, Tatjana Josifova, Ulrike Schneider, Paul B. Henrich; Quantitative Assessment of the Effect of ICG-assisted Chromovitrectomy on Macular function. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):2642.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the effect of ICG-assisted Peeling of the Internal limiting membrane on visual acuity, retinal sensitivity and contrast sensitivity.

Methods: : In a retrospective clinical case series, 13 consecutive ICG-assisted chromovitrectomy interventions in 13 patients with Macular pucker (N=5), Vitreomacular Traction syndrome (N=3), Persistent macular edema due to diabetes or retinal vein occlusion (N=3) or Macular hole stage III (N=2) were analyzed based on patient records. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) based on ETDRS charts, contrast sensitivity using the Pelli-Robson Chart , mean retinal sensitivity (dB) and stability of fixation (Microperimetry, MP-1Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy) and OCT had been measured pre- and postoperatively.

Results: : Mean follow-up was 238 days ± 95. Most post-operative measures were improved compared to pre-operative values, including BCVA(0.73± 0.46 vs. 0.40 ± 0.33 log Mar, P=0.005), OCT (444µm ± 114 vs. 313µm ± 70; P=0.0069), contrast sensitivity (1.06 ± 0.53 vs. 1.21 ± 0.31, P = 0.21 ) and fixation stability (7 eyes classified as stable vs. 9 eyes classified as stable), while mean retinal sensitivity decreased from 11.4 ± 4.24dB to 9.01 ± 3.99dB (P= 0.012 ). Changes in retinal sensitivity were inadvertently subclinical.

Conclusions: : Understanding of microperimetric response to ICG-assisted Chromovitrectomy is limited. Contrary to the relatively scarce body of evidence in the literature, our results show that retinal sensitivity may be negatively affected by ICG-assisted surgical removal of the ILM even if BCVA, OCT, contrast sensititvity and fixation stability improve. More research is needed to follow-up on the long term clinical significance of these subclinical scotomas.

Keywords: macula/fovea • macular holes • vitreoretinal surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×