March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Bacterial Susceptibility Profiles in Endophthalmitis after Intravitreal Injection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mark L. Hill
    Ophthalmology, UAB, Homewood, Alabama
  • Duncan A. Friedman
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Alabama at Birmingham, Bessemer, Alabama
  • Gerald McGwin, Jr.
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Sejal Amin
    School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Andrew Bartlett
    School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Richard M. Feist, Jr.
    Research, Retina Consultants of Alabama, PC, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Mark L. Hill, None; Duncan A. Friedman, None; Gerald McGwin, Jr., None; Sejal Amin, None; Andrew Bartlett, None; Richard M. Feist, Jr., None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 2775. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mark L. Hill, Duncan A. Friedman, Gerald McGwin, Jr., Sejal Amin, Andrew Bartlett, Richard M. Feist, Jr.; Bacterial Susceptibility Profiles in Endophthalmitis after Intravitreal Injection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):2775. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

While the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics after intravitreal injection is increasingly controversial, the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics after injection remains the standard of care. Examination of bacterial culture sensitivities in cases of post-injection endophthalmitis could provide guidance in prophylactic antibiotic selection.

 
Methods:
 

A retrospective chart review of all cases of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection was performed for all patients presenting to a tertiary referral eye hospital between 2006 and 2010. Data included patient demographics, reason for intravitreal injection, medicine injected, source of culture, and susceptibility profiles for positive bacterial cultures. An antibiogram was constructed from all positive cultures. A cost-benefit analysis was also performed comparing the number needed to treat and economic impact of fluoroquinolone antibiotic choice.

 
Results:
 

A total of 35 cases of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection occurred during the four year period observed. Fifty-four percent (54%) of endophthalmitis cultures grew specific bacteria. Fifty percent (50%) of cultured organisms were susceptible to cheaper, older generation fluoroquinolones (FQ) (ciprofloxacin and ocufloxacin) while 67% were susceptible to more expensive, newer FQ (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin). Of the patients susceptible to newer FQ, 100% were susceptible to one of the older FQ. The numbers needed to treat in a head-to-head comparison ranged between 3 and 10.

 
Conclusions:
 

Endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection remains a rare but often catastrophic complication of intravitreal injection, and every effort should be made to reduce risk of this complication. The low rates of endophthalmitis combined with the marginal benefit of using more expensive FQ antibiotics could yield a multi-million dollar savings by using less expensive prophylactic medications. Given the antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection, treatment of patients with more expensive, newer FQ medications places an unnecessary cost burden on our healthcare system and contributes to growing antibiotic resistance.

 
Keywords: endophthalmitis • injection • bacterial disease 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×