April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
The Efficacy Of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Vs Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty In Pseudophakic Glaucoma Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shimon Kurtz
    Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Souraski Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Gabi Shemesh
    Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Souraski Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Eldar Rosenfeld
    Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Souraski Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Shimon Kurtz, None; Gabi Shemesh, None; Eldar Rosenfeld, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2619. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shimon Kurtz, Gabi Shemesh, Eldar Rosenfeld; The Efficacy Of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Vs Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty In Pseudophakic Glaucoma Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2619.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : This study evaluated and compared the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects in pseudophakic patients at various time points after treatment.

Methods: : Fifty-two eyes of 52 glaucoma patients with uncontrolled IOP who underwent successful phacoemulsification-assisted cataract excision surgery with intracapsular lens implantation were randomly assigned to be treated with either ALT (N = 30) or SLT (N = 22). IOP measurements were carried out at scheduled intervals until 12 months post-laser treatment.

Results: : Forty-seven of the 52 enrollees (90%) were followed-up for 3 months, and thirty nine (75%) were followed-up for 12 months. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.011) in the IOP decrease between the ALT and SLT groups (2.55 mmHg vs. 4.26 mmHg, respectively) at 3 months but not at 6 or 12 months (3.73 Hg and 4.30 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.33) post treatment.

Conclusions: : SLT is more effective then ALT in lowering IOP in new pseudophakic patients in the first 3 months after treatment. There is no significant difference in their IOP lowering capabilities thereafter. Both laser procedures are safe and effective for treating various types of glaucoma.

Keywords: laser • intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×