April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Peripheral Refraction Across The Posterior Pole Using Structured Illumination
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christopher A. Clark
    School of Optometry, University of Indiana, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Ann E. Elsner
    Optometry,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Matthew S. Muller
    School of Optometry,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Benno L. Petrig
    School of Optometry,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Christopher A. Clark, None; Ann E. Elsner, Aeon (I, P); Matthew S. Muller, Aeon (I, E, P); Benno L. Petrig, Aeon (E, P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH EB002346
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2717. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher A. Clark, Ann E. Elsner, Matthew S. Muller, Benno L. Petrig; Peripheral Refraction Across The Posterior Pole Using Structured Illumination. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2717.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To provide low-cost, nonmydriatic screening for refractive errors and to diagnosis those that may develop myopia. To use a novel retinal imaging system, the laser scanning digital camera (LSDC) and structured illumination, to provide refractive error maps across the visual field.

 
Methods:
 

Twenty subjects with refractive errors ranging from +4.00 to -6.00 and a model eye were studied. An LSDC prototype illuminated the retina with structured illumination (850 nm) to increase contrast in the retinal images, provided by modulating the light source in a striped pattern. For each subject and a model eye, the Michelson contrast was computed across retinal locations from 1 megapixel images acquired while stepping through focus in 0.25 diopter steps. The computed central refractive error was compared with that at peripheral locations from data collected simultaneously in the 36 deg field of view. Bland-Altman and regression analyses were used to compare the subjective refraction with the LSDC auto-refraction, and the refractive errors measured across retinal locations.

 
Results:
 

Peripheral refraction measures were consistent with results reported in the literature. Specifically, myopes exhibited relative hyperopia in the periphery that was correlated with central refraction (R2=0.42, p = 0.004) across the horizontal meridian, with a slope of -0.042. The vertical meridian showed a tendency towards myopia in the periphery regardless of central refractive error. Three subjects’ data were excluded due to eye movements of several degrees, although the retinal images were clear, indicating additional image alignment and improved fixation targets are needed.

 
Conclusions:
 

Initial feasibility results have shown the potential for the LSDC to be used as a low-cost device for both retinal imaging and rapid refractive error measurement. The refractive topographical maps provide the potential to screen those at risk of developing myopia or undetected refractive error in underserved populations.

 
Keywords: myopia • refractive error development • refraction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×