April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Retrospective Review Of Pcr-confirmed Hsv And Vzv Necrotizing Retinitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Thomas A. Albini
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Ahila Lingappan
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Janet L. Davis
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Thomas A. Albini, None; Ahila Lingappan, None; Janet L. Davis, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2762. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Thomas A. Albini, Ahila Lingappan, Janet L. Davis; Retrospective Review Of Pcr-confirmed Hsv And Vzv Necrotizing Retinitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2762.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate clinical differences between polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) retinitis. This study also examines the relationship between prophylactic laser demarcation, the subsequent development of retinal detachment (RD) and final visual acuity (VA).

Methods: : Microbiological records were reviewed to identify all patients at a single academic center treated between April 1, 2000 and December 31, 2008 with a PCR-analysis of intraocular fluids positive for HSV1, HSV2 or VZV. Zone 1 refers to a 3000-um radius centered on the fovea and extends 1500-um nasally from the optic disc.

Results: : PCR-analysis of intraocular fluids confirmed the presence of VZV in 36 (57%) patients and HSV in 27 (43%) patients. The average age at presentation in the VZV group was 49 years and in the HSV group was 33 years. There was no statistically significant difference between HSV and VZV in laterality, gender distribution, or prior duration of symptoms or follow-up. Eighteen of 36 patients (50%) with VZV retinitis were HIV+ at the time of presentation, while 4 of 27 (15%) with HSV retinitis were HIV+. Eighteen (50%) of the patients with VZV-retinitis had bilateral disease, compared to 5 (19%) with HSV-retinitis (p=0.03). At initial presentation, 23 of 54 (42%) VZV-retinitis eyes had retinitis involving Zone 1, compared to 5 of 33 (15%) HSV-retinitis eyes (p=0.06). Treatment strategies varied. Seventy percent of all patients received intravenous therapy. Seventy-five percent of all patients received intravitreal injections. Eighty-nine percent of injections included both foscarnet and gancicolovir. For VZV retinitis, 13% of eyes that underwent laser demarcation subsequently developed RD, while 53% of eyes without demarcation developed RD (p=0.01). For HSV retinitis, 36% of eyes that underwent laser demarcation subsequently developed RD, while 67% of eyes without demarcation developed RD (p=0.07). The presenting vision was not statistically different between eyes that underwent demarcation and those that did not (p=0.17). The difference in final VA was statistically significant (p=0.004) between the two groups: laser demarcation (logMAR 1.38) and no laser demarcation (logMAR 2.33).

Conclusions: : In this retrospective study, patients with PCR-confirmed VZV retinitis were more likely to have HIV at presentation, bilateral disease, and zone I involvement relative to HSV. Laser demarcation was associated with a statistically significantly decreased incidence of RD and improved final VA. Prophylactic laser demarcation is likely beneficial in the management of HSV and VZV retinitis.

Keywords: retinitis • laser • herpes simplex virus 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×