April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Uncorrected Astigmatism And Computer Vision Syndrome
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mark Rosenfield
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Jennifer Hue
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Rae Huang
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Yuliya Bababekova
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Mark Rosenfield, None; Jennifer Hue, None; Rae Huang, None; Yuliya Bababekova, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2815. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mark Rosenfield, Jennifer Hue, Rae Huang, Yuliya Bababekova; Uncorrected Astigmatism And Computer Vision Syndrome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2815.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Computer vision syndrome (CVS) is a complex of eye and vision problems related to computer use which has been reported in up to 90% of computer workers. Ocular symptoms may include asthenopia, accommodative and vergence difficulties and dry eye. Previous studies have reported that small uncorrected refractive errors may have a significant impact on symptoms of CVS. However, their effect on task performance has not been determined.

Methods: : This study recorded symptoms after a sustained period of reading paragraphs of unrelated words from a computer monitor (viewing distance = 50cm) either through the habitual distance refractive correction or with a supplementary -1.00 or -2.00D oblique cylinder added over these lenses in 12 young, visually-normal subjects. Additionally, the distance correction condition (without induced astigmatism) was conducted twice to assess the repeatability of the symptom questionnaire. Subjects’ reading speed and accuracy were monitored during the course of the 10 min trial.

Results: : There was no significant difference in reading speed (mean speed = 109.9 words/min) or number of errors (mean error rate = 1.09/min) between the 3 astigmatic conditions. However, increasing astigmatism produced a significant rise in symptoms. Mean symptom scores for the 0, 1 and 2D astigmatic conditions were 0.43, 0.97 and 3.20, respectively (p= 0.000). Further, the 95% limits of agreement of the mean symptom score following the repeated zero astigmatism condition was ±1.25.

Conclusions: : The presence of uncorrected astigmatism produced a significant increase in post-task symptoms but did not affect task performance. The correction of small astigmatic refractive errors may be important in optimizing patient comfort during computer operation.

Keywords: astigmatism • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • quality of life 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.