April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Longitudinal Changes In Human Refractive Error
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Elizabeth L. Irving
    School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Carolyn M. Machan
    School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Trefford Simpson
    School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Elizabeth L. Irving, None; Carolyn M. Machan, None; Trefford Simpson, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NSERC 203699 , CRC 950-202761
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2823. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth L. Irving, Carolyn M. Machan, Trefford Simpson; Longitudinal Changes In Human Refractive Error. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2823. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Previously we have shown cross-sectional age changes in mean ocular refraction and astigmatism across the human lifespan (Irving et al ARVO 2009). The purpose of the current study was to determine if the same pattern of refractive change can be observed longitudinally.

Methods: : Patient age and best corrected refraction (sphere, cylinder and axis) were abstracted from 88 files from the School of Optometry clinic, at the University of Waterloo using all available assessment dates. Patient visits occurred between 1968 and 2010. Files selected were from patients who had been seen for a minimum of 27 years yielding a total of 1419 file dates and an average of 16 (SD +/- 5) visits per patient. Mixed modeling analysis (using R and SPSS 18) was conducted to establish growth curves and changes in mean ocular and cylinder refraction over the lifespan. Two specific hypotheses were tested examining how growth curves vary. The first was that (random effect) growth curve slope variance was zero and the second was that there was no association between each subject’s growth curve intercept and slope.

Results: : The hypothesis that (random effect) growth curve slope variance was zero, was rejected by the mixed model analysis (Wald test p<0.001). The second hypothesis, that there was no association between each subject’s growth curve intercept and slope, was also rejected. The associations between these 2 parameters for both mean spherical and cylindrical ametropia were significant (both p<0.001). The association was such that growth curves with more positive intercepts had increasingly negative slopes while those with negative intercepts had positive slopes.

Conclusions: : When observed longitudinally both mean ocular refraction and astigmatism vary systematically with age similar to cross-sectional data.

Keywords: refractive error development • refraction • aging 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×