April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Evaluation Of The Level Of Agreement Between Intended And Measured Ablation In Wavefront Optimized (WFO) Myopic Spherocylindrical Correction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Georgios Labiris
    Ophthalmology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
  • Athanassios Giarmoukakis
    Ophthalmology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
  • Anna Koutsogianni
    Ophthalmology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
  • Theocharia Sideroudi
    Ophthalmology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
  • Vassilios Kozobolis
    Ophthalmology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Georgios Labiris, None; Athanassios Giarmoukakis, None; Anna Koutsogianni, None; Theocharia Sideroudi, None; Vassilios Kozobolis, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 2844. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Georgios Labiris, Athanassios Giarmoukakis, Anna Koutsogianni, Theocharia Sideroudi, Vassilios Kozobolis; Evaluation Of The Level Of Agreement Between Intended And Measured Ablation In Wavefront Optimized (WFO) Myopic Spherocylindrical Correction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):2844.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the level of agreement between intended and measured ablation of the WFO profile, corrected by the Wellington nomogram and assess the impact on refractive outcomes.

Methods: : 86 patients who underwent in both eyes either LASIK (86 eyes) or PRK (86 eyes) WFO treatment were included in the study. The Allegretto excimer laser (software version: 2.020) was used in all cases. For the LASIK group, the Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome with 130µm cutting head was used for the creation of the flap (the hinge was created at 12 o’clock position). Differences between intended and measured ablation were evaluated with Scheimpflug camera. Refractive outcomes were evaluated by means of postoperative spherical equivalent (postSE) and postoperative defocus equivalent (postDE) and contrast sensitivity.

Results: : Both PRK and LASIK groups demonstrated significant differences between intended and measured ablation (16.7 + 8.5, p<0.001 & 11.8 + 18.5, p<0.001, respectively). For both groups, the intended ablation was the primary determinant of the measured difference (r-square 0.769 & 0.765, respectively). PRK spherocylindrical corrections over 100µ had significant impact on both postSE and postDE (p:0.044, p:0.05, respectively), while LASIK spherocylindrical corrections over 100µ had significant impact only on postDE (p:0.04). No differences were detected in contrast sensitivity for both groups. Moreover, measured differences had no impact on the number of re-treatments or ectasias (none observed).

Conclusions: : The WFO profile corrected by the Wellington nomogram is an efficient solution for myopic spherocylindrical errors. However, its efficacy is reduced in higher refractive errors that require higher intended ablations. The aforementioned results, suggest that the nomogram should be further improved to address differences between intended and measured ablations and especially deviations from the desired visual outcome.

Keywords: refractive surgery • refractive surgery: LASIK • refractive surgery: PRK 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×