March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Multifocal Electroretinogram in Eyes with Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Florian Alten
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany
  • Peter Heiduschka
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany
  • Christoph R. Clemens
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany
  • Nicole Eter
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Florian Alten, None; Peter Heiduschka, None; Christoph R. Clemens, None; Nicole Eter, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 2900. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Florian Alten, Peter Heiduschka, Christoph R. Clemens, Nicole Eter; Multifocal Electroretinogram in Eyes with Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):2900.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

While the morphologic substrate of subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD) is still unknown, different studies were able to demonstrate a strong relationship to late stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and AMD progression. However, the functional relevance of SDD remains unclear. Multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) allows for measurement of local ERG activity from the cone-driven retina and provides a topographic map of retinal electrophysiological activity.

 
Methods:
 

16 eyes of 12 patients with SDD in the posterior pole and no other phenotypic retinal alteration such as conventional drusen, choroidal neovascularization (CNV), geographic atrophy (GA) were included (5 females, 11 males; age 77.7 ± 4.4 years). Patients underwent fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fluorescence angiography (FA) and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) (Autofluorescence [ = 830 nm], near-infrared reflectance [ = 830 nm)]) (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). mfERG measurements (RetiPort, Roland Consult, Germany) were performed according to latest ISCEV guidelines.

 
Results:
 

In 4 patients exclusively SDD were present in both eyes. In 8 patients exclusively SDD were present in one eye, in the fellow eye 7 showed a CNV and 1 showed an area of GA. In all included eyes SDD could be demonstrated in SD-OCT, FA and cSLO corresponding to previous publications. By mfERG measurements, we were not able to identify any significant decrease in retinal response in the areas where SDD were present compared to non-affected areas. However, a local or general decrease of retinal mfERG response independent of SDD localization was found in 4 out of 16 eyes.

 
Conclusions:
 

SDD represent a common phenotypic hallmark in eyes with AMD. Contrary to other phenotypic characteristics of AMD, mfERG measurements did not show definite interference of electro¬physiological activity in retinal areas exclusively affected with SDD. Follow-up measurements as well as a larger patient collective are required before drawing definite conclusions concerning the functional relevance of SDD.

 
Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • drusen • electroretinography: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×