March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison Of Serum Response To Supplements Containing The Macular Carotenoids In Normals And In Patients With AMD
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Katherine A. Meagher
    Chemical and Life Sciences, Macular Pigment Research Group, Waterford, Ireland
  • John M. Nolan
    Chemical and Life Sciences, Macular Pigment Research Group, Waterford, Ireland
  • David I. Thurnham
    Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health, University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
  • Wayne Cummins
    Chemical and Life Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland
  • Alan N. Howard
    Downing College, The Howard Foundation, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Stephen Beatty
    Whitfield clinic, Institute of Eye Surgery, Waterford, Ireland
  • James Loughman
    Department of Optometry, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Katherine A. Meagher, None; John M. Nolan, None; David I. Thurnham, None; Wayne Cummins, None; Alan N. Howard, None; Stephen Beatty, None; James Loughman, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3366. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Katherine A. Meagher, John M. Nolan, David I. Thurnham, Wayne Cummins, Alan N. Howard, Stephen Beatty, James Loughman; Comparison Of Serum Response To Supplements Containing The Macular Carotenoids In Normals And In Patients With AMD. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3366.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : This study reports on serum response to three different macular carotenoid supplements in normal subjects and in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: : 54 subjects were recruited; 27 with no ocular pathology (normals) and 27 with AMD. Subjects were randomly assigned one of three carotenoid interventions. Group 1: 20 mg L, 0.8 mg Z; Group 2: 10 mg L, 2 mg Z, 10 mg MZ; Group 3: 3 mg L, 2mg Z, 17 mg MZ. Serum was assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks using high performance liquid chromatography to quantify L, Z and MZ.

Results: : Serum L concentrations significantly increased in Group 1 (0.60 µmol/L [228%] increase; p< 0.001), and Group 2 (0.86 µmol/L [370%] increase; p< 0.001), with no significant change in Group 3 (0.02 µmol/L [6%] increase; p= 0.501). Serum Z concentrations significantly increased in Group 1 (0.03 µmol/L [63%] increase; p= 0.003) and Group 2 (0.03 µmol/L [86%] increase; p< 0.001), with no significant change in Group 3 (0.005 µmol/L [7%] decrease, p= 0.287). Serum MZ concentrations significantly increased in Group 1 (week 8: 0.0094 µmol/L; p= 0.015), Group 2 (week 8: 0.063 µmol/L; p< 0.001), and Group 3 (week 8: 0.074 µmol/L; p< 0.001).

Conclusions: : A supplement containing L, Z, and MZ appears to result with optimal combined serum carotenoid response. Our novel finding that MZ is present in serum following supplementation with 20 mg of L, suggests that MZ may be formed in serum, or diffuse from the macula where it was originally hypothesised to be formed.

Clinical Trial: : www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN81595685

Keywords: carotenoids/carotenoid binding proteins • macular pigment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×