March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Dietary Supplementation With Lutein Diacetate And Lutein: A Comparison
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • John T. Landrum
    Chemistry and Biochemistry,
    Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Richard A. Bone
    Physics,
    Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Vanesa Mendez
    Chemistry and Biochemistry,
    Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Anisley Valenciaga
    Chemistry and Biochemistry,
    Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Darwin Babino
    Chemistry and Biochemistry,
    Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  John T. Landrum, Industrial Organica S.A. de C.V. (F); Richard A. Bone, Industrial Organica S.A. de C.V. (F); Vanesa Mendez, Industrial Organica S.A. de C.V. (F); Anisley Valenciaga, Industrial Organica S.A. de C.V. (F); Darwin Babino, Industrial Organica S.A. de C.V. (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Industrial Organica S.A. de C.V.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3382. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John T. Landrum, Richard A. Bone, Vanesa Mendez, Anisley Valenciaga, Darwin Babino; Dietary Supplementation With Lutein Diacetate And Lutein: A Comparison. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3382.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The responses of subjects taking a 20 mg/day lutein diacetate supplement were compared with that for a 20 mg/day crystalline lutein or a placebo.

Methods: : Ten subjects, assigned to each of three groups, lutein diacetate (group 1), lutein (group 2), and a placebo (group 3), were supplemented for 24 weeks. Groups 1 and 2 consumed a dose equivalent to 20 mg per day of free lutein. Serum samples, collected at baseline, and at weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24 were analyzed by HPLC. Macular Pigment Optical Density (MPOD) was obtained by heterochromatic flicker photometry at baseline and weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24..

Results: : The average serum lutein concentrations for weeks 6 to 24 expressed as a ratio to the baseline value (±SD) were 5.52 ± 2.88 for group 1, 4.43 ± 1.61 for group 2, and 1.03 ± 0.25 for group 3. The median rate of macular pigment increase (milli-absorbance units/week) for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 2.35, 1.55, and 0.19 mAU/wk, respectively. P-values for these serum and MPOD increases are both highly significant when compared to placebo.

Conclusions: : The average serum response was ~25% higher for group 1 compared with group 2 and, the median MPOD response was 52% higher for group 1 than group 2. P-values calculated for the differences in these increases were, p = 0.066, marginally significant, for serum, and p = 0.09 approaching significance, for MPOD.

Keywords: carotenoids/carotenoid binding proteins • macular pigment • nutritional factors 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×