March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Accuracy of Adaptive Optics Guided Refraction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Guillermo M. Perez
    Voptica S.L., Murcia, Spain
  • Eloy Villegas
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Encarna Alcon
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Enrique J. Fernandez
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Pedro Prieto
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Pablo Artal
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Guillermo M. Perez, Voptica S.L. (E); Eloy Villegas, Voptica S.L. (F); Encarna Alcon, Voptica S.L. (F); Enrique J. Fernandez, Voptica S.L. (F, P); Pedro Prieto, Voptica S.L. (F, P); Pablo Artal, Voptica S.L. (F, P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3585. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Guillermo M. Perez, Eloy Villegas, Encarna Alcon, Enrique J. Fernandez, Pedro Prieto, Pablo Artal; Accuracy of Adaptive Optics Guided Refraction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3585.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Accurate refraction is required to provide the best quality of vision for every ophthalmic correction. Manifest refraction is the current gold standard, but may be subject to significant errors. Wavefront sensors provide objective refraction but lack the subjective influence on vision. Combining both objective and subjective refraction techniques may possibly provide more accurate refraction data. We compared this type of approach using an adaptive optics (AO) system and a standard optometric procedure using a phoropter.

Methods: : The Adaptive Optics Vision Analyzer (AOVA; Voptica S.L., Murcia, Spain) is a clinical instrument that combines an objective characterization of the refractive state of the eye by a Hartmann-Shack (HS) sensing, with a posterior stage of subjective refraction refinement within the same system. A liquid crystal spatial light modulator induces the desired optical conditions while a micro-display presents visual tests through the modified optics. An artificial pupil of 4.5 mm was used. Objective refraction is calculated from a series of HS images. Then, AO-guided refraction consists of a subjective refinement for both defocus and astigmatism within the same instrument. The complete procedure is repeated 3 times. A standard refraction procedure using a phoropter was also repeated 3 times. A group of 30 healthy young subjects were studied under normal visual conditions. The outcomes were compared in terms of throughput time, intra-subject repeatability, and agreement between methods.

Results: : The average spherical equivalent was -0.87 D and -0.71 D for the AO-guided and standard refraction respectively. Standard deviation averaged through subjects was 0.14 D and 0.35 D respectively. Average visual acuity was -0.07 and -0.01 LogMAR for each procedure. The AO approach shows a significant reduction of around 60% in time required to complete the refractive evaluation as compared to the phoropter-based procedure. The AOVA added another advantage for normative studies since the effective pupil diameter was the same for every subject.

Conclusions: : AO-guided refraction provides more accurate data in a shorter consultation time. The advantages of this approach are beyond standard refraction since also permit the evaluation of more advanced optical properties of the eye such as asphericity or special phase profiles by using AO.

Keywords: refraction • aberrations • visual acuity 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.