March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Influence Of Astigmatism On Reading Performance
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Oliver K. Klaproth
    Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe Univ Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Maria Casagrande
    Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe Univ Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Jens Bühren
    Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe Univ Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Martin Baumeister
    Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe Univ Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Thomas Kohnen
    Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe Univ Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Oliver K. Klaproth, None; Maria Casagrande, None; Jens Bühren, None; Martin Baumeister, None; Thomas Kohnen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  DFG BA 3443/2-1
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3610. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Oliver K. Klaproth, Maria Casagrande, Jens Bühren, Martin Baumeister, Thomas Kohnen; Influence Of Astigmatism On Reading Performance. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3610.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To evaluate effects of astigmatism on reading acuity (RA), near visual acuity (NVA) and reading speed (RS).

 
Methods:
 

In 23 eyes of 23 subjects (26 +/-6 years) tropicamide eye drops were administered to achieve short-term cycloplegia. Using cylindrical glasses of -0.75D and -1.5D in 90° and 180° additionally to best distance correcting glasses only, influence of astigmatism on RA [logRAD], NVA [logMAR] and RS [words/min] was evaluated. Radner-Sentences and Snellen-E optotypes were displayed on a TFT-screen with the Salzburg Reading Desk, allowing for automated detection of reading distance (RD) and RS. Default RD was 40cm. Raytracing aberrometry was performed (iTrace). Differences in metrics according to orientation and magnitude of astigmatism have been tested with Wilcoxon’s-matched-pairs-test. Bland and Altman’s method was used to show general differences between RA and NVA. Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of demographic, refractive and aberrometric status on metrics. The overall significance threshold was p=0.05.

 
Results:
 

Overall reading distance was 41.33 +/-0.27cm. No significant influence of magnitude of astigmatism on RA, NVA and RS was shown. Astigmatism with-the-rule always resulted in significantly decreased metrics compared to against-the-rule or no astigmatism. Medians and ranges were: RA90;0.75=0.68 (0.08 to 0.93), RA90;1.5=0.61 (0.19 to 0,92), RA180;0.75=0.56 (0.08 to 0.92), RA180;1.5=0.49 (0.12 to 0.87) and RA0=0.51 (-0.01 to 0.89). NVA90;0.75=0.50 (0.07 to 0.83), NVA90;1.5=0.58 (0.26 to 0.94), NVA 180;0.75=0.47 (0.06 to 0.72), NVA180;1.5=0.38 (0.19 to 0.82) and NVA0=0.50 (0.00 to 0.82). RS90=167 (45 to 299) , RS180=192 (54 to 271) and RS0=180 (89 to 339). NVA was always better than RA. Demographic, refractive and aberrometric status had no influence on any metric.

 
Conclusions:
 

Orientation of astigmatism had a significant influence on reading performance. With-the-rule astigmatism decreased parameters compared to against-the-rule and no astigmatism.

 
Keywords: cataract • reading • astigmatism 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×