March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Do Higher Order Aberrations and Ocular Accommodation Play a Role during Blur Adaptation?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Narayanan Rajeev
    Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore, Singapore
  • Phillip A. Bedggood
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • Andrew Metha
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Narayanan Rajeev, None; Phillip A. Bedggood, None; Andrew Metha, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Endeavour International Postgraduate Research Scholarship & Science Faculty Scholarship, Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3662. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Narayanan Rajeev, Phillip A. Bedggood, Andrew Metha; Do Higher Order Aberrations and Ocular Accommodation Play a Role during Blur Adaptation?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3662.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate whether dynamics in ocular accommodation and higher order aberrations contribute to the reported improvements in letter acuity and changes in contrast sensitivity following blur adaptation

Methods: : We built a compact Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor to measure wavefront aberrations before and immediately after subjects (n = 6) adapted to 30 minutes of +2 D blurred, calibrated natural scenes. During aberrometry, subjects fixated on a high-contrast letter E generated on a CRT monitor placed 5 m away with a +2 D defocus lens in situ. Eighty aberrometry readings (4 runs of 20 readings each, with 45 seconds break between runs) for the right eye were collected for pre- and post-adaptation condition. Wave aberrations were computed over a 4 mm pupil and Zernike coefficients up to the fifth order (21 terms) were studied using a custom written program in MATLAB®. Ocular accommodation was derived from the defocus and astigmatism terms of the second-order Zernike coefficients. Pupil size was not altered pharmacologically since we wanted to investigate the role of aberrations under natural viewing conditions.

Results: : Ocular accommodation showed no significant differences (mean difference = 0.02 D; p = 0.46) between pre- and post-adaptation conditions, suggesting that a significant relaxation in accommodation or a change in defocus is not a contributory factor in the improved visual performance resulting from blur adaptation. Similarly, neither spherical aberration (RMS difference: 0.04 µm; p = 0.52), coma (RMS difference: 0.06 µm; p = 0.49), nor combined higher order aberrations (RMS difference: 0.03 µm; p = 0.84) showed any significant changes following blur adaptation. The combined higher order aberrations incorporated third through fifth order aberrations including that of coma and spherical aberration, while coma included both the horizontal and vertical components together. The results suggest no significant optical contributions to blur-adaption, even when analyzed at the individual subject level.

Conclusions: : Ocular accommodation and the higher order aberrations play no significant contributory role during blur adaptation. These findings support the claim that improvements in visual performance following sustained defocus-induced blur are not due to any optical contributions, but are likely due to a neural mechanism.

Keywords: aberrations • adaptation: blur • accommodation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×