March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison between the PlusoptiX and iScreen Photoscreeners in Detecting Amblyopic Risk Factors in Children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jing G. wang
    Des Moines University, johnston, Iowa
  • Donny W. Suh
    Wolfe Eye Clinic, West Des Moines, Iowa
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Jing G. wang, None; Donny W. Suh, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3882. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jing G. wang, Donny W. Suh; Comparison between the PlusoptiX and iScreen Photoscreeners in Detecting Amblyopic Risk Factors in Children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3882.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To compare the accuracy of plusoptiX A08 photoscreener (PPS) and iScreen 3000 photoscreener (IPS) in objectively screening for amblyopic risk factors in children age 5 months to 13 years old.

Methods: : Cross-sectional study of one hundred forty-eight children who received photoscreenings via PPS and IPS and a comprehensive pediatric ophthalmic examination in our office. Patients were considered to have amblyogenic risk factors based on the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) referral criteria guidelines.

Results: : 45 percent of patients undergoing a pediatric ophthalmology examination were found to have amblyopia or amblyogenic risk factors. In this study, PPS demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 75.4%, specificity of 68.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 67.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 76.1%. However, IPS photoscreener had an overall sensitivity of 66.2%, specificity of 87.6%, PPV of 81.8%, and NPV of 75.5%.Discussion: The accuracy of PPS and IPS was compared in different age groups. The sensitivity and specificity were analyzed according to varied amblyogenic risk factors. The statistic results of this study were compared to those of previous studies, including Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study and the Iowa PhotoScreening Program.

Conclusions: : PPS and IPS proved to be useful tools in the objective vision screening in children. PPS was found to have a higher sensitivity, and IPS showed a higher specificity and PPV in detecting amblyopic risk factors. In conclusion, one device may be more beneficial over the other, depending on the patient population and office settings.

Keywords: screening for ambylopia and strabismus 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.