April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Characterization of an Experimental Lubricant Solution for Dry Eye
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Elaine Campbell
    Consumer Products R & D, Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Texas
  • James W. Davis
    Consumer Products R & D, Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Texas
  • Howard A. Ketelson
    Consumer Products R & D, Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Texas
  • Michelle Senchyna
    Consumer Products R & D, Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, Texas
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 3828. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elaine Campbell, James W. Davis, Howard A. Ketelson, Michelle Senchyna; Characterization of an Experimental Lubricant Solution for Dry Eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):3828.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Polymers used in lubricant eye drops display significant physico-chemical differences especially when formulated in specific vehicles. Hydroxypropyl Guar (HPG) has been shown to provide lubrication on various substrates. This work summarizes the physical and biological attributes of an alternative guar polymer system (AGP) compared to HPG.

Methods: : Physical properties were characterized by steady state flow (viscosity vs. shear rate) and oscillation (tan(Δ) vs stress) experiments using a TA2000ex rheometer The extensional properties were performed with a CaBER modified with a video monitor (3mm plate with Aspect Ratio of 4). The extensional properties were characterized with a Polymer Filament Break-up Time (PFBT) measured in seconds. Biological performance was measured as the ability to protect immortalized human corneal epithelial cells from damage initiated through exposure to desiccation stress. Cells were incubated with test solutions (AGP or HPG) or media (control) for 30 minutes, followed by 0 or 30min of desiccation at 37°; 45% humidity. To assess retention of cellular protection, a wash step was added between test compound exposure and desiccation. An MTS assay was used to determine % protection compared to control. Retention of cellular protection was also assessed.

Results: : AGP displayed a similar shear thinning effect and viscosity profile compared to HPG, with 40cPs and 14cPs respectively at 10sec-1. AGP displayed a significantly lower tan(Δ) compared to HPG; 6.1 vs 9.5 respectively at 1.0µNm (p< 0.05). The PFBT for AGP was significantly different to HPG (GT: 20sec vs 0.1 sec, respectively (p< 0.05)). AGP and HPG demonstrated a similar ability to protect cells from desiccation stress (40-60%), while retention associated with AGP was greater than that of HPG (90% vs 75%, respectively).

Conclusions: : A novel AGP was identified that differs from HPG in both physico-chemical and biological attributes. The most relevant characteristics include improved viscoelasticity and longer PFBT that may correlate to improved desiccation protection and retention on the ocular surface, leading to improvement in ocular surface protection.

Keywords: cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • cornea: basic science 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×