April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison Of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Anterior Segment OCT, Non-Contact Specular Microscope And Ultrasonic Pachymetry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Riccardo Scotto
    DiNOG, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Marina Papadia
    DiNOG, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Alessandro Bagnis
    DiNOG, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Raffaella Rosa
    DiNOG, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Carlo E. Traverso
    DiNOG, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Riccardo Scotto, None; Marina Papadia, None; Alessandro Bagnis, None; Raffaella Rosa, None; Carlo E. Traverso, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4093. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Riccardo Scotto, Marina Papadia, Alessandro Bagnis, Raffaella Rosa, Carlo E. Traverso; Comparison Of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Anterior Segment OCT, Non-Contact Specular Microscope And Ultrasonic Pachymetry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4093.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate and compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values measured with Anterior Segment OCT (AS-OCT), Non-contact Specular Microscope (NCSM), and ultrasound pachymetry.

Methods: : CCT was measured in 182 healthy eyes of 182 patients without ocular abnormalities other than refractive errors. Three consecutive measurements of CCT by the same examinator were obtained sequentially by AS-OCT, Non-contact Specular Microscope and ultrasound pachymetry.

Results: : The average CCT measured by AS-OCT, Non-contact Specular Microscope and ultrasound pachymetry were 535.75 ± 1.43 µm, 546.41 ± 10.89 µm and 537.95 ± 3.95 µm. The mean differences between modalities were 10.66 µm (P=0.006) between AS-OCT and Specular Microscope, 2.19 µm (P=0.56) between ultrasound pachymetry and AS-OCT and 8.46 µm (P=0,03) between Specular Microscope and ultrasound pachymetry.

Conclusions: : CCT plays an important role in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making in many eye diseases. Various instruments are available as possible replacement for ultrasonic pachymeter, which is considered nowadays the gold standard due to its good reproducibility and repeatability. CCT measurements by AS-OCT are comparable to those by ultrasound pachymetry; statistically significant differences were found between Non-contact Specular Microscope measurements and both AS-OCT and ultrasound pachymetry.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • anterior segment • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×