April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Detection Of Glaucoma Progression By Traditional And Alternation Flicker Review Of Stereo Disc Photographs
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Scott D. Smith
    Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York
  • Nathan M. Radcliffe
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • Zeba A. Syed
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Gustavo V. De Moraes
    Ophthalmology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Sung Chul Park
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
  • Jeffrey M. Liebmann
    Ophthalmology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Robert Ritch
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Scott D. Smith, None; Nathan M. Radcliffe, None; Zeba A. Syed, None; Gustavo V. De Moraes, None; Sung Chul Park, None; Jeffrey M. Liebmann, None; Robert Ritch, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness, Stacey Kanbar Research Fund of the New York Glaucoma Research Institute, New York, NY.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4168. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Scott D. Smith, Nathan M. Radcliffe, Zeba A. Syed, Gustavo V. De Moraes, Sung Chul Park, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, Robert Ritch; Detection Of Glaucoma Progression By Traditional And Alternation Flicker Review Of Stereo Disc Photographs. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4168.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare the detection and inter-observer agreement in grading of glaucomatous optic disc progression using automated alternation flicker and side-by-side (SBS) viewing of stereo optic disc photographs.

Methods: : Serial stereophotographs from 125 consecutive glaucoma patients with >8 reliable visual fields (VF) were obtained. Eyes were categorized as having rapid, moderate, or slow VF change by the global rate of threshold sensitivity change. Two graders masked to progression status reviewed the stereophotographs in random order both with SBS viewing and aligned with automated alternation flicker (EyeIC, Narbeth, PA). Each grader identified disc hemorrhage (DH), parapapillary atrophy (PPA) change, vessel movement (VM), rim change, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) change. Inter-observer agreement for each parameter and overall progression based on change in any parameter was assessed using the kappa statistic. The proportion of eyes classified as having disc progression by each viewing method was also compared for each grader, stratified by the rate of visual field progression.

Results: : Inter-observer agreement was greater using flicker than SBS review for DH (kappa: 0.75 vs 0.67), PPA change (0.57 vs 0.41), VM (0.62 vs 0.33), rim change (0.59 vs 0.30) and RNFL change (0.56 vs 0.39). Agreement for overall assessment of disc progression was also greater using flicker (0.70 vs 0.39). Detection rates for grader 1 were significantly higher (all p≤0.0001) using flicker than SBS viewing for DH (12.0% vs 5.1%), PPA (22.8% vs 6.3%), VM (16.4% vs 2.5%), and rim change (17.1% vs 3.2%). Detection rates for grader 2 were significantly higher (all p<0.02) using flicker for PPA change (15.8% vs 5.1%) and VM (15.2% vs 8.2%). Rates for identifying overall progression were higher using flicker for both grader 1 (35.4% vs 10.8%) and grader 2 (31.0% vs 20.9%; both p<0.00005). For each grader, more individual parameters and the classification of overall progression were more strongly associated with the rate of VF change using flicker than SBS viewing.

Conclusions: : Inter-observer agreement and sensitivity of detection of optic disc progression are increased by review of stereophotographs using alternation flicker.

Keywords: optic disc • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×