April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
A National Survey of Practice Patterns: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Temporal Artery Biopsy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Julie M. Schallhorn
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Sara J. Haug
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Michael K. Yoon
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Travis Porco
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Stuart R. Seiff
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California
  • Timothy J. McCulley
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Julie M. Schallhorn, None; Sara J. Haug, None; Michael K. Yoon, None; Travis Porco, None; Stuart R. Seiff, None; Timothy J. McCulley, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4283. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Julie M. Schallhorn, Sara J. Haug, Michael K. Yoon, Travis Porco, Stuart R. Seiff, Timothy J. McCulley; A National Survey of Practice Patterns: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Temporal Artery Biopsy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4283. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : This study is designed to assess the current clinical practice patterns among oculoplastic surgeons, neuro-ophthalmologists and rheumatologists with regard to unilateral versus bilateral temporal artery biopsy for giant cell arteritis.

Methods: : A survey was sent via e-mail to the members and affiliates of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS), the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) using the Survey Monkey website (surveymonkey.com). All responses were anonymous, no identifying information was acquired. Data analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test or Wilcox rank sum test as appropriate.

Results: : Self described primary sub-specialty of the 649 respondents were as follows: oculoplastic surgery (n=129), neuro-ophthalmology (n=120), both oculoplastic surgery and neuro-ophthalmology (n=14), rheumatology (n=380) and other (n=6). Among the respondents, some (n=301) perform TAB whereas others do not perform the surgery themselves but do refer patients for biopsy (n=344). Overall 65% (n=424) advocated initial unilateral TAB, 16% (n=105) advocated bilateral biopsy in all cases and the remainder (14%, n=92) recommended either unilateral or bilateral TAB depending on the degree of clinical suspicion. Of those that advocated initial unilateral TAB, opinions were split as to whether they would (n=162, 42%) or would not (n=224, 58%) advocate biopsy on the fellow side. Twenty-two percent (n=86) of rheumatologists advocate bilateral biopsy initially, as opposed to 11% of neuro-ophthalmologists (n=14) and 8% of oculoplastic surgeons (n=10), this difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). Once one side had been biopsied, both rheumatologists (n = 126, 46%, p=0.05) and neuro-ophthalmologists (n=40, 49%, p<0.05) were more likely to advocate biopsy of the second side than oculoplastic surgeons (n=28, 33%).

Conclusions: : Temporal artery biopsy practices vary greatly between neuro-ophthalmologists, oculoplastic surgeons, and rheumatologists. This lack of consensus underscores the need for a systematic assessment of our varying practice patterns.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • autoimmune disease 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×