April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison Of Outcomes In Eyes Undergoing Epiretinal Membrane Peeling In Patients With And Without Pre-existing Age-related Macular Degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Anand B. Bhatt
    Ophthalmology, Univ of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
  • David Callanan
    Texas Retina Associates, Arlington, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Anand B. Bhatt, None; David Callanan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4480. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anand B. Bhatt, David Callanan; Comparison Of Outcomes In Eyes Undergoing Epiretinal Membrane Peeling In Patients With And Without Pre-existing Age-related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4480.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

There is a significant group of patients with coexisting epiretinalmembrane (ERM) and age related macular degeneration (AMD). Thesepatient’s may theoretically have poorer visual acuityoutcomes from surgery to remove an ERM. To date, no study hasinvestigated whether this group of patients enjoys the samebenefit from surgery for ERM peeling as otherwise healthy eyesof age matched patients.

 
Methods:
 

31 eyes undergoing ERM peeling with pre-existing AMD were comparedto 33 eyes of otherwise healthy age matched control eyes undergoingERM peeling. Pre and post operative best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) in LogMAR notation and pre and post operative centralmacular thickness (CMT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT)were compared. Post operative data was collected in a window4 to 6 months after surgery to allow adequate healing time andboth metrics were collected on the same visit.

 
Results:
 

There was an average improvement in logMAR acuity of 0.188 inthe disease group, and an average improvement of logMAR 0.105in the control group. The average difference in the CMT wasan improvement of 73um in eyes with AMD and 72um in the controleyes. These differences were not statistically significant.

 
Conclusions:
 

Eyes with AMD are likely to derive the same benefit of epiretinalmembrane peeling as otherwise healthy eyes.  

 

 
Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery • age-related macular degeneration • proliferative vitreoretinopathy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×