March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Agreement and Test-Retest Reliability of Pupil Size Measurements with two digital infrared pupillometers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Philipp M. Prahs
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Eva Schön
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • David Märker
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Isabel Oberacher-Velten
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Horst Helbig
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Wolfgang Herrmann
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Philipp M. Prahs, None; Eva Schön, None; David Märker, None; Isabel Oberacher-Velten, None; Horst Helbig, None; Wolfgang Herrmann, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 4039. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Philipp M. Prahs, Eva Schön, David Märker, Isabel Oberacher-Velten, Horst Helbig, Wolfgang Herrmann; Agreement and Test-Retest Reliability of Pupil Size Measurements with two digital infrared pupillometers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):4039.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the agreement and test-retest reliability of pupil size measurements under scotopic conditions with two digital infrared pupillometers.

Methods: : In 54 eyes of 27 healthy volunteers (mean age 44 years ± 18 (SD)) pupil size was measured with two digital infrared pupillometers (Procyon P2000 SA and Neuroptics VIP-200) at 0.04 lux scotopic illumination. Prior to measurement a standardized dark-adaptation protocol was used. Measurements were taken twice with each instrument on the same day. Results were analyzed with the Bland-Altman method, a paired t-test was used to test for a statistically significant difference in measurements.

Results: : A scotopic pupil diameter of 5.9 mm ± 0.83 SD and 6.2 mm ± 0.71 SD respectively was measured with the Procyon and the Neuroptics device. The mean difference of measurements taken with the two pupillometers was 0.3 mm ± 0.41 SD. The difference in measurements was statistically significant (p<0,001). Repeated measurements of the Neuroptics pupillometer showed a higher test-retest agreement of consecutive measurements as compared to the Procyon device resulting in a lower standard deviation of differences of consecutive measurements (Neuroptics 0.17 mm, Procyon 0.43 mm).

Conclusions: : Under scotopic illumination conditions using a standardized dark adaptation protocol pupil diameter assessed with the Neuroptics device was significantly larger as compared to the Procyon pupillometer. Repeated measurements with the Neuroptics pupillometer showed smaller spread and were better reproduced.

Keywords: pupil • refractive surgery • optical properties 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×