April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Outcomes of Photodynamic Therapy vs. Bevacizumab in the management of Central Serous Retinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Laxmi V. Devisetty
    Vitreoretinal Services, Associates in Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Miguel Busquets
    Vitreoretinal Services, Associates in Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Brian Jewart
    Vitreoretinal Services, Associates in Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Martin Boscarino
    Vitreoretinal Services, Associates in Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Laxmi V. Devisetty, None; Miguel Busquets, None; Brian Jewart, None; Martin Boscarino, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4512. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Laxmi V. Devisetty, Miguel Busquets, Brian Jewart, Martin Boscarino; Outcomes of Photodynamic Therapy vs. Bevacizumab in the management of Central Serous Retinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4512.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To evaluate the outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT) vs. intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of central serous retinopathy (CSR).

 
Methods:
 

A retrospective, comparative study of consecutive patients with CSR treated with PDT or bevacizumab at a single retina practice. Inclusion criteria are age > 18y, presence of CSR by fluoroscein angiography, treatment with PDT or bevacizumab. Patients with follow-up < 6 months or patients with causes other than CSR were excluded. The outcomes studied include visual acuity, angiographic resolution, center point thickness (CPT) on OCT and number of treatments required.

 
Results:
 

Ten patients treated with PDT (group 1) and 10 patients treated with bevacizumab (group 2) were evaluated in the study. The mean age was 48 in both groups. The baseline visual acuity was 20/60 for group 1 and 20/80 for group 2. The mean final visual acuity was 20/50 for group 1 and 20/30 for group 2. Visual improvement in Group 1 was not statistically significant (p=0.82); there was a trend towards improvement in group 2 (p=0.13). On average, group 1 received 2.1 treatments of PDT, and group 2 received 3.8 bevacizumab injections. In group 1, 30% gained vision, 70% had no change in vision. In group 2, 100% of the patients had gained vision. There was complete angiographic resolution in both groups. CPT improved from a mean of 350um to 235um in group 1 and 408um to 179um in group 2. There were no complications associated with either of the groups.

 
Conclusions:
 

There was no significant improvement in vision in the PDT group. However, there is a trend towards visual improvement in patients receiving bevacizumab. This outcome appears to correlate with a reduction in subretinal and intraretinal fluid on OCT.

 
Keywords: retinal neovascularization • choroid: neovascularization • retinitis 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×