April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison of Two Ways of Preserving Sclera Samples: Dehydration in Ethyl Alcohol versus Glycerol
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rafael S. Arcieri
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Ana Costa, Santos, Brazil
  • José M. Costa
    Brazilian Dental Association - Uberlândia Section, Uberlândia, Brazil
  • Sérgio A. Costa
    Brazilian Dental Association - Uberlândia Section, Uberlândia, Brazil
  • Danilo H. Costa
    University of Uberaba, Uberaba, Brazil
  • Karla O. Murta
    Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
  • Cecílio P. Souza Neto
    Molecular Biology Lab,
    Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
  • Enyr S. Arcieri
    Ophthalmology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
    Presidente Antônio Carlos University, Araguari, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Rafael S. Arcieri, None; José M. Costa, None; Sérgio A. Costa, None; Danilo H. Costa, None; Karla O. Murta, None; Cecílio P. Souza Neto, None; Enyr S. Arcieri, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4549. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rafael S. Arcieri, José M. Costa, Sérgio A. Costa, Danilo H. Costa, Karla O. Murta, Cecílio P. Souza Neto, Enyr S. Arcieri; Comparison of Two Ways of Preserving Sclera Samples: Dehydration in Ethyl Alcohol versus Glycerol. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4549.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To compare the effect of preserving sclera samples in either dehydration in ethyl alcohol or glycerol.

Methods: : Sixteen samples of human sclera were studied. Half of them were preserved with glycerol and half preserved by dehydration with ethyl alcohol. The weight of each sample was standardized by precision balance with 3mg. The process of protein extraction was performed using a lysis buffer, macerating and, subsequently, with beta-mercaptoethanol. After performing the whole procedure, the supernatant was removed. Eight samples were selected in which the protein was close to perform electrophoresis of proteins. Samples run on SDS-PAGE 14% gels. Subsequently, the bands were ruddy by Coomassie Blue R-250-0.5% and Silver coloration. The results were evaluated by the concentration of protein in each band of the gels in a qualitative way.

Results: : Although the protein concentration was higher in samples preserved in glycerol (31.59 ± 9.89 mg/ml) than in dehydration (27.38 ± 6.28 mg/ml), there was no statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.3262). The mean absorbance was 0.211 ± 0.066 for glycerol and 0.183 ± 0.042 for dehydration (p=0.3253). Through qualitative analysis of ruddy bands on each gel, both in Comassie-Blue and Silver staining, a higher concentration of protein was observed in the bands that ran sclera materials preserved in glycerin.

Conclusions: : Surgeons who use sclera in ophthalmic procedures should be aware of the different characteristics when comparing the sclera preserved using glycerol or by dehydration. Maybe it could interfere with immunological response after surgery. Further studies are necessary to elucidate these findings.

Keywords: anterior segment • wound healing • sclera 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.