April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Ocular Motor Analysis of Monocular Visual Preference in Children with Amblyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joost Felius
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas
    UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
  • Richard W. Hertle
    Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
  • Jingyun Wang
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas
  • Vidhya Subramanian
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas
  • Reed M. Jost
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas
  • Priscilla M. Berry
    UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
    Pediatric Ophthalmology, Dallas, Texas
  • Eileen E. Birch
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas
    UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Joost Felius, None; Richard W. Hertle, None; Jingyun Wang, None; Vidhya Subramanian, None; Reed M. Jost, None; Priscilla M. Berry, None; Eileen E. Birch, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY05236
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4690. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joost Felius, Richard W. Hertle, Jingyun Wang, Vidhya Subramanian, Reed M. Jost, Priscilla M. Berry, Eileen E. Birch; Ocular Motor Analysis of Monocular Visual Preference in Children with Amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4690. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Timely detection of amblyopia in preverbal children is hampered by the limited sensitivity of grating acuity and fixation preference testing. We evaluated eye movement recordings (EMRs) as a potential efferent system outcome for young children with interocular asymmetry in the afferent visual system, and to assess whether visual acuity asymmetries are reflected in asymmetric monocular EMR outcomes.

Methods: : EMRs (sampling rate 500 Hz; EyeLink1000 or Ober2) were obtained during binocular and monocular fixation from 22 children, age ≥5 years, with amblyopia (9 anisometropic, 5 strabismic, 8 combined mechanism.) Monocular best-corrected visual acuity was tested in each eye. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of EMRs were assessed in terms of waveforms and oscillation frequency, and compared to the interocular difference (IOD) in visual acuity.

Results: : Of the 22 children (mean IOD=0.4±0.2 logMAR), 19 (86%) showed ocular motor dysfunction. Most (n=18) showed pathologic square-wave oscillations (SOs), while fewer had waveforms typical of infantile (n=3) or fusion maldevelopment (n=5) nystagmus syndromes. However, the overall presence of abnormalities was not associated with IOD and some of the ‘deeper’ amblyopes did not show abnormalities in waveform or frequency. The 19 with EMR abnormalities all showed interocular asymmetry in waveform and/or oscillation frequency, and in all cases the least severe ocular motor dysfunction was found in the better seeing eye. The presence of interocular SO asymmetry was associated with IOD (t=2.5, P<0.001). No effects of the type of amblyopia were found (P>0.2).

Conclusions: : Asymmetric ocular motor abnormalities, most prominently SOs, are common in children with amblyopia. In those with EMR abnormalities, we found 100% concordance between ‘eye with better eye movements’ and ‘eye with better visual acuity’. The presence of asymmetric SOs in amblyopia may reflect a poor coupling of the monocular sensory-motor calibration during a sensitive period of visual development. EMRs appear to be a valid ‘motor’ approach to assessing ‘sensory’ preference in amblyopia, which may be useful in preverbal children. Refining the choice of EMR parameters may result in a better association of the ocular motor outcome and the depth of amblyopia.

Keywords: amblyopia • nystagmus • eye movements 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×