April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulae in Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Matthew Swanic
    Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • David R. Hamilton
    Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Matthew Swanic, None; David R. Hamilton, Alcon Labs (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4736. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matthew Swanic, David R. Hamilton; Comparison of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulae in Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4736.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae ( Holladay II, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, and SRK-T) in two modern multifocal IOLs (Tecnis Multifocal ZMB00 and Alcon ReSTOR +3 SN6AD1).

Methods: : 42 patients had the SN6AD1 implanted while 20 patients had the ZMB00 lens implanted. All lenses were implanted by a single surgeon. Preoperative axial lengths were measured with partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster.) Keratometry values were based on IOLMaster K values. All patients had refractions measured at least one week postoperatively. Holladay IOL Consultant software was utilized for IOL selection and postoperative data calculations. Lenses implanted were routinely selected based on the Holladay II formula.

Results: : Mean refractive error for the Alcon SN6AD1 was 0.006, -0.001, -0.003 and 0.001 for the Holladay II, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, and SRK-T respectively while the mean absolute refractive error was 0.336, 0.370, 0.411, and 0.368 respectively. Mean refractive error for the Tecnis ZMB00 was -0.013, -0.048, -0.007, and -0.104 for the Holladay II, Holladay I, Hoffer-Q, and SRK-T respectively while the mean absolute refractive error was 0.255, 0.242, 0.260, and 0.266 respectively. Using the Holladay II formula 94% of eyes receiving the SN6AD1 were within +/- 0.5D spherical equivalent refractive error while 95% of eyes receiving the Tecnis ZMB00 were within +/-0.5D spherical equivalent refractive error. 55/62 (89%) of eyes in this study had axial lengths between 22 and 26mm.

Conclusions: : All 4 modern theoretical IOL calculation formulae performed similarly in IOL power calculation for the Restor and Tecnis Multifocal IOLs in this study population of eyes with axial lengths between 22 and 26mm.

Keywords: treatment outcomes of cataract surgery • anterior segment • intraocular lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×