April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
The Eye Is Adapted To The Blur Level Imposed By Its Optical Aberrations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lucie Sawides
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Pablo de Gracia
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Carlos Dorronsoro
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Michael A. Webster
    Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada
  • Susana Marcos
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Lucie Sawides, None; Pablo de Gracia, None; Carlos Dorronsoro, None; Michael A. Webster, None; Susana Marcos, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  MICINN FPI Predoctoral Fellowship FIS2005-04382 to LS; CSIC JAE-Pre to PdG; EY-10834 to MW; MICINN FIS2008-02065 and EURYI-05-102-ES (EURHORCs-ESF) to SM.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 4769. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lucie Sawides, Pablo de Gracia, Carlos Dorronsoro, Michael A. Webster, Susana Marcos; The Eye Is Adapted To The Blur Level Imposed By Its Optical Aberrations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):4769. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To evaluate whether subjects are naturally adapted to the overall amount of blur produced by their own High Order Aberrations (HOA).

Methods: : Judgments of perceived blur were measured in 11 subjects to determine for each individual the physical blur level that appeared best focused. A sequence of aberrated images was simulated using 128 different real complex wave aberration patterns from real eyes, for 5-mm pupils. The optical quality of these eyes ranged from almost diffraction-limited (achieved with AO-correction measurements) to high amounts of HOA (from surgical eyes). Optical blur was simulated by convolution of the corresponding PSFs excluding tilt and astigmatism, and adjusting defocus to maximize optical quality. Strehl ratios (SR) ranged from 0.049 to 0.757. Simulated images of a 1.98 deg face were presented on a CRT monitor, and viewed monocularly through an adaptive-optics (AO) deformable mirror that compensates for the subject’s natural aberrations. A Badal system compensated for spherical error. AO-correction and pupil centration were continuously monitored and controlled during the experiment. In a 2AFC task, subjects responded whether the image appeared blurred or sharp, with the blur level varied with the QUEST algorithm to estimate the perceived neutral point.The results were analysed in terms of SR, by comparing the natural SR of the subject with the SR of the image perceived as neutral by the subject.

Results: : Subjects’ natural SR (at best focus) ranged from 0.065 to 0.282 (5-mm pupils). We found an excellent correspondence between the image quality perceived as neutral and the retinal image quality produced by the aberrations of the subject, with an average deviation of 0.009 (in terms of SR), and a strong correlation between the blur of the image perceived as neutral and the subject’s own blur (R = 0.93; p<0.001; slope=1.19).

Conclusions: : Individuals may have an internal code for blur/sharpness, given by the overall amount of blur produced by their HOA. Although our experiment cannot rule out a fine tuning to the specific orientation of the blur, our results are consistent with an adaptation to the overall blur, regardless of its form.

Keywords: adaptation: blur • aberrations • perception 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.