March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Subjective Depth Of Focus And Subjective Quality Of Vision With Multifocal Contact Lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Guillaume Vandermeer
    Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France
  • Yannick Nochez
    Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France
  • Yohann Bernard
    Aimé Cotton Laboratory, CNRS, Paris Sud University, Orsay, France
  • Jean-Jacques Gicquel
    University Hospital, Poitiers, France
  • Pierre-Jean Pisella
    Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France
  • Richard Legras
    Aimé Cotton Laboratory, CNRS, Paris Sud University, Orsay, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Guillaume Vandermeer, None; Yannick Nochez, None; Yohann Bernard, None; Jean-Jacques Gicquel, None; Pierre-Jean Pisella, None; Richard Legras, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 4710. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Guillaume Vandermeer, Yannick Nochez, Yohann Bernard, Jean-Jacques Gicquel, Pierre-Jean Pisella, Richard Legras; Subjective Depth Of Focus And Subjective Quality Of Vision With Multifocal Contact Lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):4710.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the through-focus quality of vision and subjective depth-of-focus (DoF) in patients wearing different multifocal contact lenses.

Methods: : Subjective DoF is defined as the range of defocus leading to a defined level of blur (i.e. objectionable and bothersome blur). Through-focus subjective quality of vision was evaluated from -4 to 3 diopters (D) by 0.1-D step using a 5 items grading scale (i.e. ITU-R 500 recommendations) and DoF were measured using bothersome blur and objectionable blur criterias. All measurements were realized under cycloplegia (i.e. cyclopentolate 0,5%) using a 5mm artificial pupil and three 0,4 log MAR high contrast letters as a target in 5 conditions: naked eyed and eye wearing various contact lenses: Proclear multifocal (MF) Distance addition +2.50, Proclear MF Near addition +2.50, Air Optix MF High, Air Optix MF Low.

Results: : The mean naked eye subjective DoF for bothersome and objectionable blur was respectively 1.18-D and 1.78-D. Using bothersome and objectionable blur criteria, the larger subjective DoF was obtained with the Proclear MF Near +2.50 (i.e. respectively 2.93-D and 3.62-D) and the Proclear MF Distance +2.50 (i.e. respectively 1,7-D and 3,05-D). However in these conditions, the through-focus curves and subjective DoF became bimodal leading to a lack of intermediate vision. Moreover, compare to the naked eye curve the width of the through-focus curves with contact lenses were enlarged at the expense of a decreased of the peak of the quality of vision. The width of the curve measured at an acceptable level of quality of vision (i.e. grade 2 on 5) and both subjective DoF were negatively correlated to the peak of the quality of vision (r2=0,86).

Conclusions: : Multifocal contact lenses increased depth of focus. However there is always a tradeoff between depth of focus and quality of vision: the more depth of field is important, the more quality of vision degrades. Subjective DoF became bimodal only with some contact lenses, traducing differences between contact lenses geometry and subjectivity of multifocality.

Keywords: contact lens • presbyopia 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×