April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Corneal Stromal Stem Cells
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dr Khurram Hashmani
    Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Andrew Hopkinson
    Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Matthew Branch
    Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Harminder Singh Dua
    Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Dr Khurram Hashmani, None; Andrew Hopkinson, None; Matthew Branch, None; Harminder Singh Dua, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5151. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dr Khurram Hashmani, Andrew Hopkinson, Matthew Branch, Harminder Singh Dua; Corneal Stromal Stem Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5151.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To characterise the stem cell properties of corneal stromal cells (CSC) and to investigate their potential for differentiation into corneal epithelial cells (CEC).

Methods: : CSC from donor rims were cultured for up to 9 passages and assessed against stem cell criteria. Investigations included flow cytometry to evaluate the expression of mesenchymal (MSC) and haematopoietic (HSC) markers. Furthermore, the ability of CSC to differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts and chondroblasts was assessed by histochemistry and qPCR. CSC were expanded in 2 different culture media. The cells from both cultures were sorted into 2 separate populations based on HSC marker expression. These 4 populations were assessed for MSC characteristics. The potential of each of these sub-groups to differentiate into CEC was analyzed by flow cytometry and qPCR.

Results: : CSC showed both HSC and MSC marker expression up to 4 generations. The different culture media showed clear distinction in the marker profile and differentiation potential of CSC. CSC separated by CD34 expression showed a significant difference in their expression of SC markers and their ability to differentiate. The differently cultured cells all produced CEC. However, one population showing a clearly superior differentiation capacity.

Conclusions: : A population of CSC may have stem cell properties. Stimulation of these cells may be used to generate CEC. This has potential for clinical treatment of ocular surface disease.

Keywords: cornea: stroma and keratocytes • cornea: epithelium • regeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×