April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison Of The Tono-pachymeter NT530P With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer And Influence Of Corneal Properties On Intraocular Pressure Differences Between Tonometers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Laura Tranchina
    University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Marco Lombardo
    Fondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Rome, Italy
  • Francesco Oddone
    Fondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Rome, Italy
  • Sebastiano Serrao
    Vision Engineering, Rome, Italy
  • Domenico Schiano Lomoriello
    Fondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Rome, Italy
  • Pietro Ducoli
    Fondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Rome, Italy
  • Marco Centofanti
    University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Laura Tranchina, None; Marco Lombardo, None; Francesco Oddone, None; Sebastiano Serrao, None; Domenico Schiano Lomoriello, None; Pietro Ducoli, None; Marco Centofanti, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5190. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Laura Tranchina, Marco Lombardo, Francesco Oddone, Sebastiano Serrao, Domenico Schiano Lomoriello, Pietro Ducoli, Marco Centofanti; Comparison Of The Tono-pachymeter NT530P With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer And Influence Of Corneal Properties On Intraocular Pressure Differences Between Tonometers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5190.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To analyze repeatability and agreement of the Tono-pachymeter NT530P (Nidek Co., LTD, Gamagori, Japan) with the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and further estimate the influence of corneal properties on intraocular pressure (IOP) differences between tonometers

Methods: : Sixty-two normal eyes of 62 subjects were included in the study. Three sessions of measurements, each consisting of three sets of measures, were performed. Repeatability and agreement between tonometers were examined by coefficient of variation (CoV), coefficient of repeatability (CoR) and Bland-Altman analysis. The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT), keratometry (Km), and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert, Buffalo, IL, USA) measurements of corneal viscoelasticity (Corneal Hysteresis, CH; and Corneal Resistance Factor, CRF) on differences between tonometers was further evaluated.

Results: : IOP measurements repeatability was higher with the GAT than NT530P: CoV values were 4.3- and 5.5-mmHg and CoR values were 16.6% and 18.4% respectively. The CRF was calculated to be the best predictor of the differences in IOP readings between tonometers (23%; p<0.001), followed by CCT (15%; p=0.003) and CH (14%; p=0.003). Km performed very poorly as lone predictor of IOP differences. In a multiple regression model, CRF, CH and CCT together accounted for 25% (p<0.01) of the variance in IOP reading differences between tonometers

Conclusions: : The NT530P demonstrated moderate repeatability in the population studied and should not be used interchangeably with the GAT in clinical practice. Corneal resistance to applanation induced by contact or non-contact tonometers was calculated to be the most determinant factor in influencing differences in IOP values between tonometers.

Keywords: intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×