March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Effect of Transient Visual Changes on Postural Control
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Guillaume L. Giraudet
    Psychophysics & Visual Perception Lab, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    ESSILOR Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Brigitte Millette
    Psychophysics & Visual Perception Lab, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Sharlee Deziel-Gagnon
    Psychophysics & Visual Perception Lab, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Jocelyn Faubert
    Optometry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Guillaume L. Giraudet, ESSILOR Canada (E); Brigitte Millette, None; Sharlee Deziel-Gagnon, None; Jocelyn Faubert, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 4826. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Guillaume L. Giraudet, Brigitte Millette, Sharlee Deziel-Gagnon, Jocelyn Faubert; Effect of Transient Visual Changes on Postural Control. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):4826.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : The aim of the current study was to determine the effect on postural stability of various transient changes in the visual environment following different adaptation periods.

Methods: : Thirty-four subjects participated in the experiment. They stood in a fully immersive virtual reality environment. The stimulus was a 3D textured tunnel, either static or moving sinusoidaly at a frequency of 0.5Hz in the anterior-posterior direction. Each trial was composed of 3 stages. The first one was called "Baseline" (10s), during which the tunnel was static. Then the stimulus started oscillating back and forth for 10, 20 or 30 seconds; the "Adaptation" stage. Three "post-adaptation" conditions were then considered: i) no visual information; ii) static tunnel; iii) phase inversion of the moving pattern. A magnetic motion sensor, located on the stereoscopic goggles, was used to register body movements. Postural reactions to the various visual conditions were described by the Body Sway Amplitude (BSA), that is the postural sways at the frequency of the oscillating tunnel, so the tendency of the subject to follow the moving scene.

Results: : Comparing Baseline and Adaptation stages, results showed that there was a significant increase in the amplitude of sways due to the onset of the moving stimulus. Then, when the tunnel disappeared or stopped, BSA decreased significantly. The phase inversion had no measurable effect on BSA. The same pattern of results was found for all Adaptation stage durations.

Conclusions: : The results confirm the major impact of the moving stimulus on postural control. As soon as the tunnel starts moving, subjects tend to follow its displacement. This adaptation is fast, less than 10 seconds, as the three Adaptation sequences used showed no differences.

Keywords: adaptation: motion • aging: visual performance 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.