March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Ocular Dominance in Elite SAthletes Differs from the General Population
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michel Guillon
    OTG Research & Consultancy, London, United Kingdom
  • Kristine DALTON
    OTG Research & Consultancy, London, United Kingdom
  • Shehzad Naroo
    School of Life Sciences (Optometry), Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Cecile A. Maissa
    OTG Research & Consultancy, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Michel Guillon, None; Kristine Dalton, None; Shehzad Naroo, None; Cecile A. Maissa, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 4849. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michel Guillon, Kristine DALTON, Shehzad Naroo, Cecile A. Maissa; Ocular Dominance in Elite SAthletes Differs from the General Population. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):4849.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Ocular dominance is one of the few ocular characteristics that sports coaches consider when training elite athletes for sports involving aiming at a target (e.g. pigeon shooting, archery), tracking a ball (e.g. baseball, cricket) or aligning a target (e.g. golf). The objective of this analysis was to assess if, for elite athletes spending thousands of hours practicing their chosen sport, ocular dominance and its association with motor dominance, is sports specific and different from the ocular dominance of the general population.

Methods: : Pointing dominance was measured using a two-handed technique to avoid bias and was classified as strong, weak or non-dominance based upon the measured misalignment. Motor dominance was ascertained via questionnaire. The analysis covers elite (European Tour) and sub-elite (European Challenge Tour and club pro) golfers (n = 17), elite (County) and sub-elite (Youth Academy) cricketers (n = 30) and a control group of people involved at most in sport at the recreational level (n = 49).

Results: : The findings revealed that: i. 80-100% of participants in the various groups were right handed; ii. Ocular dominance was different in the three groups: absence or weak dominance was more prevalent in cricketers than in the control (46.7% vs. 26.5%, p=0.012) and strong dominance trended to be more prevalent in golfers (94.1% vs. 73.5%, p=0.054); iii. Strong ocular dominance prevalence was similar for R & L eyes in golfers (R:52.9%, L:41.2%) and controls (R:36.7%, L:36.7%) but strongly biased to the right in cricketers (R:40.0%, L:13.3%); iv. The prevalence of ipsilateral ocular vs. motor dominance was significantly lower in cricketers than either control (26.7% vs. 40.8%, p=0.041) or golfers (52.9%); v. Amongst golfers ocular dominance changes significantly (p<0.001) between primary gaze position (representing ball alignment with the aim line) and putting gaze position (representing alignment of the club with the ball). In the putting position there is a significant decrease in strong ocular dominance and individual players putting gaze dominance cannot be determined from primary measurements.

Conclusions: : The findings revealed significant differences in ocular dominance between the general population and some elite athletes, which are hypothesised to be associated with the specific sport demands.

Keywords: vision and action 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.