March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Investigating The Effect Of Mechanical Limitation Of The Irides On Pupil Light Reflex Using Brimonidine Induced Miosis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yanjun Chen
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Randy H. Kardon
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
    Ophthalmology, Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Yanjun Chen, None; Randy H. Kardon, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Grant for the Iowa City Center of Excellence for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 4900. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yanjun Chen, Randy H. Kardon; Investigating The Effect Of Mechanical Limitation Of The Irides On Pupil Light Reflex Using Brimonidine Induced Miosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):4900.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To investigate how small pupil size may reduce the extent of its movement, blunting the efferent portion of the pupil light reflex. The results from this study may facilitate a more reliable interpretation of pupil responses as an indicator of light processing by the retina and brain in health and disease.

 
Methods:
 

Pupil responses were recorded using a dual channel binocular eye frame pupillometer (Arrington Research, Scottsdale, AZ), to a series of Ganzfeld light stimuli with a stepwise increase in stimulus intensity (Diagnosys, Lowell, MA). One eye of eight normal subjects was treated with 0.2% brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution to achieve a reduction in pupil size by inhibiting sympathetic tone to the dilator muscle without affecting the iris sphincter muscle. The pupil responses from both eyes were recorded simultaneously. The amount of pupil contraction as a function of stimulus intensity was compared between the brimonidine treated, miotic eye and the untreated eye.

 
Results:
 

Brimonidine treatment produced significant reduction in pupil size in normal subjects (mean reduction in pupil size: 1.8±0.35 mm, p<0.05). For increasing light intensity, the treated pupil started to show reduced pupil contractions compared to the contralateral untreated pupil when the peak of pupil contraction reached an average pupil size of 3.3±0.60 mm (range 2.4 to 4.4 mm) among the eight subjects. When measured by percent pupil contraction (contraction amplitude/baseline pupil diameter), the pupil response as a function of stimulus intensity in the treated, miotic eye did not differ from that in untreated eye.

 
Conclusions:
 

Iris mechanics limit the amount of pupil contraction and can act to reduce the assessed neuronal integration of the pupil light reflex. The pupil size where this starts to occur was found to be on the average, 3.3 mm, but could vary among individuals. Pupil response assessed by using percent contraction amplitude is least affected by mechanical effects and might be a more reasonable approximation of afferent input.  

 
Keywords: pupillary reflex • iris • drug toxicity/drug effects 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×