April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparative Evaluation Of Confocal Microscopy And Culture Results In The Diagnosos Of Acanthamoeba Keratitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Juliana M. prazeres
    ophtalmology, unifesp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Flávio Hirai
    ophtalmology, unifesp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Vivian Sakai
    ophtalmology, unifesp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Denise de Freitas
    ophtalmology, unifesp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Fabio Carvalho
    ophtalmology, unifesp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Annette Foronda
    ophtalmology, unifesp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Juliana M. prazeres, None; Flávio Hirai, None; Vivian Sakai, None; Denise de Freitas, None; Fabio Carvalho, None; Annette Foronda, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 5835. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Juliana M. prazeres, Flávio Hirai, Vivian Sakai, Denise de Freitas, Fabio Carvalho, Annette Foronda; Comparative Evaluation Of Confocal Microscopy And Culture Results In The Diagnosos Of Acanthamoeba Keratitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):5835.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To compare the agreement between confocal microscopy and corneallaboratory culture in patients with suspected Acanthamoeba keratitis

 
Methods:
 

This study was a retrospective analysis of records of caseswith suspected Acanthamoeba keratitis. Individuals who had suspectedkeratitis and were submitted to both laboratory culture andconfocal microscopy for diagnosis were included in the study.Overall agreement and kappa statistic were calculated to assessthe agreement between the two diagnostic methods.

 
Results:
 

29 individuals who had suspected Acanthamoeba keratitis andwere submitted to both lab culture and confocal microscopy.Mean age was 34.76 ± 11.66 years (Range: 17.4 - 64.1);15 cases (51.7 %) had positive and 14 (48.3%) had a negativeculture for Acanthamoeba. Confocal Microscopy was positive in10 patients (34.5%), negative in 15 pacientes (51.7%) and inconclusivein four patients (13.8%). The overall agreement of both examswas 68%.The kappa statistic was 0.35

 
Conclusions:
 

This study showed a moderate agreement between corneal cultureand confocal microscopy.  

  

 
Keywords: Acanthamoeba • microscopy: confocal/tunneling • cornea: epithelium 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×