April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
The Effectiveness of Alcaftadine Ophthalmic Solution as Evaluated in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model of Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis at 15 Minutes and 16 Hours After Instillation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jack V. Greiner
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Avner Ingerman
    Retina, ORA, Andover, Massachusetts
    Vistakon Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Jacksonville, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Jack V. Greiner, None; Avner Ingerman, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 6427. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jack V. Greiner, Avner Ingerman; The Effectiveness of Alcaftadine Ophthalmic Solution as Evaluated in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model of Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis at 15 Minutes and 16 Hours After Instillation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):6427.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the effectiveness of alcaftadine 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.25% ophthalmic solutions compared to placebo for the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) clinical model. The study design included an active comparator (olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution).

Methods: : 170 subjects were randomized into 1 of 5 treatment groups; 164 subjects completed all study visits. At screening Visits 1 and 2, a CAC was performed to determine then confirm the eligibility of subjects. The CAC was repeated at treatment visits_Visit 3 (day 0±3), 16 hours post-test agent instillation and Visit 4 (day 14±3), 15 minutes post-agent instillation. Ocular itching, conjunctival redness and other signs and symptoms of allergy were evaluated after allergen challenge.

Results: : At Visits 3 and 4, alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine 0.1% treatments exhibited significantly lower mean scores compared to placebo for conjunctival redness. Regarding ocular itching scores at Visit 4, all active treatment groups were clinically (≥1 unit difference) and statistically (p<0.001) superior to placebo at all time points. Mean differences from placebo for alcaftadine 0.25% were -1.95, -1.92, and -1.77 units at 3, 5, and 7 minute post-CAC time points, respectively. For the corresponding times, olopatadine itch scores were -1.89, -1.84, and -1.66, respectively. At Visit 3, all three alcaftadine concentrations produced lower mean ocular itching scores in subjects than either placebo and olopatadine treatment. All doses of alcaftadine were well tolerated. Reported adverse events were mild in severity.

Conclusions: : Alcaftadine 0.25% ophthalmic solution demonstrated a rapid onset of action (15 min) and prolonged duration of action (16 hrs). The significant improvement over placebo treatment (p<0.001) in the symptom of itching due to allergic conjunctivitis, makes alcaftadine 0.25% an optimal choice for once-daily-dosing.

Clinical Trial: : unregistered, IntegReview Protocol 04-003-10

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×