April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
The Impact Of Lens Wear On In Vivo Wettability Of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nancy J. Keir
    School of Optometry-CCLR, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Craig Woods
    School of Optometry-CCLR, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Desmond Fonn
    School of Optometry-CCLR, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Nancy J. Keir, CIBA VISION (F); Craig Woods, CIBA VISION (F); Desmond Fonn, CIBA VISION (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Financial support was provided by CIBA VISION
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 6505. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nancy J. Keir, Craig Woods, Desmond Fonn; The Impact Of Lens Wear On In Vivo Wettability Of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):6505.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To assess the impact of lens wear on in vivo wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Methods: : Two silicone hydrogel materials (lotrafilcon B (LB), balafilcon A (BA)) were worn by 19 subjects in a contralateral eye, dispensing study. Measurements were completed at baseline (BLN) and 4wks. In vivo wettability measures included graded wettability (0-4, 0=perfect) and pre-lens non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT, seconds). Differences between materials and individual changes were assessed.

Results: : Mean±SD (range) graded wettability at BLN and 4wks was: 1.08±0.85 (0-2.75) and 1.33±1.01 (0-3.75) for LB and 1.86±1.14 (0-3.75) and 2.11±1.16 (0.25-3.75) for BA. Graded wettability was better for LB compared to BA (p<0.05) but did not change over time (p=0.06). NITBUT at BLN and 4wks was: 6.5±3.0 (3.7-16.1) and 5.6±2.2 (2.9-10.9) for LB and 6.2±2.9 (3.4-13.3) and 5.0±2.6(1.3-12.8) for BA. There was no difference in NITBUT between materials, however there was a decrease over time (p<0.05). Individually, graded wettability decreased (>0.5 change in grade) with lens wear in 47% and 53% and improved in 26% and 37% of subjects for LB and BA, respectively. Pre-lens NITBUT decreased (>1 second change) with lens wear in 47% and 53% and improved in 16% and 11% of subjects for LB and BA, respectively.

Conclusions: : In vivo wettability varied between subjects and differed between materials. While lens wear reduced in vivo wettability for most subjects, in some cases there was an improvement with wear. This would suggest that the tear film may act to enhance wettability in some subjects fitted with silicone hydrogels, and that initial wettability may not predict that seen over time.

Clinical Trial: : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01010555

Keywords: contact lens • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×