March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Efficacy Of Unfixed Versus Fixed-Combination Glaucoma Therapy In Reducing Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Matteo Sacchi
    Ophthalmology, San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Stefano Ranno
    Ophthalmology, San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Andrea Lembo
    Ophthalmology, San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Paolo Nucci
    Ophthalmology, San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Matteo Sacchi, None; Stefano Ranno, None; Andrea Lembo, None; Paolo Nucci, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 5100. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matteo Sacchi, Stefano Ranno, Andrea Lembo, Paolo Nucci; Efficacy Of Unfixed Versus Fixed-Combination Glaucoma Therapy In Reducing Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):5100.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To compare diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients treated with unfixed-combination latanoprost/timolol, bimatoprost/timolol and travoprost/timolol versus fixed-combination.

Methods: : A total of 124 eyes of 124 patients with POAG previously treated with unfixed-combination of latanoprost/timolol (n=40), bimatoprost/timolol (n=43) and travoprost/timolol (n=41) for at least 3 months and switched to fixed-combination for compliance reasons were retrospectively evaluated and considered for the analysis. IOP was evaluated during treatment with individual components and 3 month after switch to fixed-combination. IOP was assessed by diurnal curve at 8AM; 11AM; 3PM; 5PM; 8PM. IOP value at any time point was the mean of 2 IOP measurements. Diurnal IOP fluctuation was calculated as highest daily IOP - lowest daily IOP. Fluctuation was also dichotomised: high (> 6 mm Hg), low (< or = 6 mm Hg).

Results: : Mean diurnal IOP was similar with unfixed and fixed-combination therapy (p > 0.05). For each group diurnal IOP fluctuation was significantly lower in the unfixed-combination compared to fixed-combination (latanoprost/timolol 3.4±1.7 mmHg vs 4.8±2.1 mmHg, bimatoprost/timolol, 3.3±1.4 mmHg vs 4.6±1.9 mmHg, travoprost/timolol 3.3±1.8 mmHg vs 4.9±2.0 mmHg, p < 0.05). The percentage of patients with high diurnal IOP fluctuation increased from 32% to 45% (p < 0.05) after 3 months of fixed-combination therapy.

Conclusions: : Unfixed-combination of latanoprost/timolol, bimatoprost/timolol or travoprost/timolol resulted in lower diurnal IOP fluctuation and significantly fewer patients with a high fluctuation compared with fixed-combination. Mean IOP showed no difference between concomitant use of individual components and fixed-combination. The unfixed component therapies may have an independent effect on reducing IOP fluctuation in addition to lowering IOP.

Keywords: intraocular pressure 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.